The Difference Between Executive Onboarding And Performance Failure

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”3.22″][et_pb_row _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” custom_margin=”5px|auto||auto||” custom_padding=”6px|||||”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.0.2″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” custom_padding=”||0px|||”]

 

While there is certainly an overlap, there are important differences between executive onboarding and performance failures. The vast majority of people that fail in jobs fail for one of three reasons: poor fit, poor delivery, or poor adjustment to a change down the road.

 

  • Poor fit is always a failure of selection, due diligence or attitude during onboarding.
  • Poor delivery is an onboarding failure if it’s caused by getting up to speed too slowly and a performance failure later on.
  • Poor adjustment is an onboarding failure if it’s rooted in not yet having built a network of trusted advisors to point out the need to adjust or how to adjust. It’s a performance failure if it’s rooted in a fundamental inability to see changes or listen to others.

 

The heart of executive onboarding well is converging into the team before trying to evolve it. This requires getting a head start, managing the message and then setting direction and building the team leading up to and through your first 100-days or so. Follow this with sustaining momentum and adjusting to change and your risk of onboarding failure is greatly decreased.

Poor Fit

Poor fit gets called out either as “They just didn’t fit” or “They weren’t who they pretended to be.” It is, by definition, a disconnect, a failed dance of the bumble bees. Of course, candidates for jobs should sell before they buy. Of course, hiring managers want to position their firms in the best possible light. That’s all fine during the early stages of the dance, courtship, recruiting process.

But shame on you if you don’t change it the moment an offer is provisionally accepted.

Hiring manager offers someone a job. They say yes. What should be the next words out of the hiring manager’s mouth?

Should they be “Great. See you in two weeks.”?

Should they be “Let me connect you with HR to manage through the paperwork.”?

Should they be “Wonderful. What do you need from us?”

None of the above.

They should say “I’m not prepared to accept your acceptance until you do a real due diligence. Take a couple of days. Dig in. Ask the really tough questions. Then tell me you still want the job.”

There are only two scenarios. The first is that the person discovers something that makes them say no – most likely a fit issue. That’s a win for all involved. If they figured it out in a couple of days before accepting, you know they were going to figure it out in a couple of weeks after starting. If they bail out before accepting, you still have your second-choice candidate available. If they quit after they’ve started, you have to start the whole search again.

The second scenario is that they look hard and then say yes again. In this case the hiring manager has started their relationship with their new employee by coming around to their side of the table and helping them figure out what’s right for them – earning trust by being trustworthy.

Delivery

Poor delivery is measurable. Still it gets explained by either “They couldn’t get the job done” or “They didn’t give me the resources I needed to get the job done.”

The onboarding delivery risk is an inability to figure out, marshal and lead resources fast enough.

The ongoing performance risk is an inability to figure out, marshal and lead resources on any timeline.

Adjustment

Things change. People often miss or can’t adjust to change. If it’s during their onboarding period, they haven’t figured things out yet or haven’t built strong enough relationships for people to tell them the truth.

If it’s after they’ve onboarded, they may have a permanent blind spot, an insurmountable bias, or an ongoing inability to build trusting relationships.

Implication

Shame on you if you don’t provide or search out the help a new leader needs to accelerate progress during onboarding. After the onboarding period focus on getting the right people in the right roles and out of the wrong ones.

Click here for a list of my Forbes articles (of which this is #600) and a summary of my book on executive onboardingThe New Leader’s 100-Day Action Plan.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

Read More Articles

A large crowd of people seated closely together, viewed from behind, attending an event or presentation in a dimly lit venue.
The Stakeholders You’re Not Thinking About – And Why They Can Derail Your First 100 Days

Cracker Barrel made headlines when its relatively new CEO departed after less than two years in the role they were hired to transform. The reasons were complex, but one thread…

Read Article
A person holding a clipboard with a blank sheet of paper and a pen poised to write
Outcome-Based Governance: Aligning Policies, Guidelines, and Principles

Policies channel compliance. Guidelines invite contribution. Principles earn commitment. Start with how you want people to behave at work and then design your governance stack to reinforce, not inhibit that.  Three…

Read Article
Concept image of human brain made of blue and gray paint brushes
The Neuroscience of Leadership: Accelerating Growth Mindset and Enterprise Performance

Organizations’ futures depend less on what their people know today than on how fast they can learn, adapt, and execute tomorrow. Building on Carol Dweck’s Growth Mindset – the idea that abilities can be…

Read Article
A group of professionals collaborating.
Everything Communicates: Especially As and To an Executive Onboarding into a New Role

Everything communicates. Everything you say and don’t say, do and don’t do, and the order in which you say and do it sends a message. The same is true for everyone around you. As an executive onboarding into a…

Read Article
Group team working in a office.
Designing The Right Offsites for Different Leadership Levels

Offsites can be rocket fuel or expensive theater. One difference is whether you design each for the kind of leadership each level needs to provide: cultural, strategic, operational, or tactical. When you nest your offsites to fit those roles, you…

Read Article
Argentina flag with the body shape of the country in soccer field.
Strategic Adaptation in Leadership: Lessons from the Argentina–England World Cup Semi-Final

The Argentina–England World Cup semi-final was not just a game; it was a live case study in how leaders deploy strategy and tactics—and what happens when they fail to adjust…

Read Article