The Difference Between Decentralization And Abrogation

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” _builder_version=”3.22″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.27.4″ module_alignment=”left”]

Empowerment ranks right up there with motherhood and apple pie on most people’s list of absolute goods. But there’s a fine line between decentralization and abrogation. High -performing decentralized organizations focused on service and customer experience operate with guided accountability. Not giving decentralized leaders that guidance is an abrogation of senior leadership’s responsibilities and a recipe for chaos.

POI Framework

 GEORGE BRADT

 

The framework for What It Takes To Accelerate Through A Strategic Inflection Point is laid out in that earlier article. The main point is that you must align your culture, organization, operations and CEO’s real job around one of four strategies. This current article explores the organization required to support service or customer experience strategy.

The fundamental premise of decentralization is that some decisions are better made closer to the point of contact with customers, guests or competitors. Consider the difference between strategies and tactics.

  • Strategos – The art of the general, arranging forces before the battle.
  • Taktikos – Deployment of forces in the actual battle.

As a business leader, there is a range of how much delegation and leverage you choose – from doing things yourself through directing, partnering, coaching to abrogating.

  • Do – Highest control/least leverage
  • Direct – High control/leverage over actions
  • Partner – Shared control and leverage
  • Guide – High leverage/moderate control
  • Abrogate – Infinite leverage with no control or influence

Do

When you things yourself they get done the way you want to do them. But there’s no leverage of your time or ideas as, by definition, no one else is helping you.

Direct

When you direct or tell someone to do something, the best you can hope for is compliance. If your core strategy is production, compliance is what you need. You keep control over people’s thinking and have high leverage through their actions.

Partner

Partners share. They share thinking. They share actions. They share control. They leverage each other. This is what happens in a high-performing matrix.

Guide

Guided accountability is the most appropriate approach for a decentralized organization. You get high leverage through others’ actions. You get some control and a lot of influence through your guiding strategies and principles. And you get the benefit of others’ thinking.

Abrogate

Abrogating responsibility is a wonderful thing – if you don’t care what others do. Don’t get me wrong. Sometimes you don’t care about some of the minor details. In these cases, delegating without managing is a sound approach. It’s never the right approach for something that’s important to you.

But if you are going to be best in class at service and customer experience, you’ll need to push service decisions as close to the customer as possible. This is the essence of a decentralized organization. Do this within the framework of guiding principles. Do this with the “E” in CEO standing for chief “Experience” officer, always championing customer experience in everything you are, do, and say.

The Ritz-Carleton exemplifies guided accountability. They operate as “Ladies and gentlemen serving ladies and gentlemen,” and focus on superior service all the time. If you tell any bellboy about a broken TV in your room, that bellboy will take ownership of getting it fixed. They won’t necessarily do the work. But they are accountable for making sure the problem is fixed and that your experience is as good as it can be.

Keys to effective decentralization

The key to success in a decentralized organization is guided accountability. Guided accountability has two parts. The accountability has to be real. That means it has to be delegated – for real. And it has to be accepted – for real. Accountability is a two-edged sword with positive consequences for success and negative consequences for failure.

The second part is the guidance. This has to be clear enough for people to know what you expect them to do in most cases. And it has to be loose enough for them to be free to do the right thing for the customers and bend the guidelines a little.

Implications for you

This is the only possible road to success for a service-oriented organization.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

Read More Articles

Group team working in a office.
Designing The Right Offsites for Different Leadership Levels

Offsites can be rocket fuel or expensive theater. One difference is whether you design each for the kind of leadership each level needs to provide: cultural, strategic, operational, or tactical. When you nest your offsites to fit those roles, you…

Read Article
Argentina flag with the body shape of the country in soccer field.
Strategic Adaptation in Leadership: Lessons from the Argentina–England World Cup Semi-Final

The Argentina–England World Cup semi-final was not just a game; it was a live case study in how leaders deploy strategy and tactics—and what happens when they fail to adjust…

Read Article
Confident executive standing on a modern stage, delivering a presentation
Act Like You’re Already Successful to Jump-Start Success

Success doesn’t start when you “make it.” It starts when you behave like you already have. The best leaders - whether they are taking on a new CEO role, launching…

Read Article
Picture of the Allies Normandy World War II amphibious assault D‑Day
Why Leaders Get the Followers and Decisions They Deserve

Leaders don’t simply get the followers they deserve; they get the decisions they design for. When leaders understand the different ways people create value - artistically, scientifically, and interpersonally -…

Read Article
Primegenesis Operational Leadership
The Underappreciated Power of Operational Leadership

Operational leadership is the undervalued fulcrum between theory and reality. It is where strategy stops living in slide decks, where culture becomes observable behavior, and where tactics gain the coherence…

Read Article
NBA Champions game
The Stockdale Paradox: Preparing Your Leadership Team for Adversity

Down 29 points in the third quarter of Game 4 of the 2026 NBA Finals, the New York Knicks did something that had never been done in Finals history. With…

Read Article