100-Day Action Plan: A Cheat for the Good

Cover of a booklet titled "How to Play Se...
 

Let me be clear from the start.  Most cheating is bad.  Fraud, dishonesty, unfaithfulness are hard to condone.  But some cheating is good.  No one gets too upset if a shortstop cheats towards second base or a center half-back cheats towards the left side.

100-day action plans are some of the highest, best forms of cheating.

 

They're generally not 100-days. 

We push people very hard to get a head start.  If someone crafts their 100-day action plan three weeks before they start and then takes advantage of the fuzzy front end before the start, they could end up with 120 days to implement their 100-day plan.  This is a very high, very good form of cheating.

They give new leaders an unfair advantage. 

People with 100-day plans are better prepared and have more confidence than people without 100-day plans.  So a leader with a plan has an advantage over that same leader without a plan.  Giving yourself an advantage versus yourself is another very high, very good form of cheating.

They give leaders' teams an unfair advantage. 

People following leaders with 100-day plans have an easier time because the leader is more clear.  Giving your followers an unfair advantage is yet another very high, very good form of cheating.

Net, cheating is a good thing if it involves a little extra work, a little extra clarity, to make it easier for the leader and the team to do what they need to do.  So cheat.  Not for bad.  For good.

 

Read More Articles

Why You Should Have More, Not Fewer Meetings | Meeting Effectiveness for Leaders

Meeting effectiveness is not about having fewer meetings. It is about having the right meetings, with the right people, for the right reasons, done in the right way. When leaders…

Read Article
The Artistry in Communication: Where Leadership Comes Alive

Executive communication is often taught as a process of alignment — aligning messages with culture, strategy, operations, and tactical missions. That’s necessary but not sufficient. The artistry lies not in…

Read Article
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through

Teams fail when direction is fuzzy, resources are ambiguous, or authority is blurred. Too often, leaders assign tasks without enough context for teams to make smart, independent decisions. The result?…

Read Article
High Stakes Landmines for Technology Executives

By Jeff Scott with George Bradt High-stakes onboarding landmines are everywhere for new technology executives, but few are as deadly—and as fixable—as a misaligned role. Being the right technology leader…

Read Article
Preparing For The Next Point Of Inflection With Contingency And Capability Plans

The next point of inflection is coming whether you’re ready for it or not. Your success as a leader doesn’t hinge on your ability to predict the future, but on…

Read Article
The Baked Ziti Approach To Making The Implicit Explicit

Sometimes it’s best to hint at things implicitly so others can interpret as they see best. Sometimes it’s best to explain things explicitly so others can follow precise directions. And…

Read Article