Why Economic Self-Sufficiency Is Imperative In The Coming US-China Reset, Per Ram Charan

China Shipping UNIVERSAL IMAGES GROUP VIA GETTY IMAGES

In addition to all that’s happening in and around Ukraine, the big macro issues of our time include climate, inflation/supply chain and the accelerating U.S.-China reset. CEO advisor and author Ram Charan is convinced that the U.S. and its allies need a clear coordinated approach to regain superior economic self-sufficiency and stem the chronic, growing trade deficit and capital outflows to the country that has announced its intention to out-compete them. The U.S. needs to expand its economic and technology lead against China continuously.

Democratic vs Autocratic Spheres of Influence

As Charan explained to me, there’s a fundamental divide between The United States and its democratic sphere of influence, including Canada, Mexico, Western Europe, Australia, Japan, South Korea and others, and China and its growing, autocratic sphere of influence, including Russia, North Korea and a few other autocracies in the making. Charan thinks India is in the middle and “actively disengaging” from doing business with China.

Unmistakable and Irreversible Reset

Charan calls the global reset “unmistakable and irreversible.” In the past, the balance of power hinged on military might. U.S. national security strategy was driven by the military branch. While the military is the ultimate source of strength, the new rivalry is an Economic War. Superior economic power, including the engines of continued technology superiority, feeds relative military strength.

The Lead Up

Only recently has China’s economy gained meaningful power with its GDP growing in leaps from $395 billion in 1990 to $1.2 trillion in 2000, then to $6.1 trillion in 2010 and $14.7 trillion in 2020. It has narrowed the gap substantially with the U.S. GDP of $20.9 trillion in 2020.

Before 2007, most thought ever-growing free trade with China was a good thing. Now the situation has radically changed. China has shown itself to be an aggressive rival, not just a trading partner. The U.S. has let its core competence of technology, business know how and trade deficits fuel China’s GDP, political and military power. More importantly it has boosted China’s self-confidence to block America’s initiatives, such as standards setting.

 

Economic War

Charan is most concerned that there’s an economic war going on and those in the democratic sphere don’t even know they’re in it, let alone losing. On the other hand, China is leading its sphere to strengthen its economies at the expense of those in the democratic sphere.

The unmistakable and irreversible reset has already happened. The only question is whether the democracies will wake up and choose to freeze it where it is or let it continue on its current course either consciously or unconsciously.

The Charan Doctrine

The Charan doctrine is that the rivalry between national spheres of influence is a three-legged stool made up of political, military and economic strengths. Like a three-legged stool, the legs are interdependent. Without relative economic strength, the sphere’s political and military strength will decay over time. As the autocracies’ relative economic strength increases, so will their political and military strength.

Just as no nation can compete over time with another nation on which it is dependent for military resources, no nation or sphere can compete effectively with its rival who controls its supply chain and accumulates trillions of trade surplus and hard dollar currency.

Act Now to Attain Superior Self-Sufficiency in Trade

This leads to Charan’s most important premise. The U.S.-led democratic sphere needs a set of powerful and coordinated actions over the next three-years, with transparent milestones, to become superior in self-sufficiency again. The goals would be no more trade deficits with the autocracies and no more net capital transfers, as well as total control of technologies, particularly advanced algorithms and “general intelligence”.

Note self-sufficiency is not protectionism. The goal is not to prevent China from doing what it can do internally. It is to strengthen the U.S. and its allies and at the same time protect the leakage of its strengths.

As the economic war evolves, the absolute dependencies will become transparent. America needs a few critical raw materials from China. China needs food, energy, technology, foreign direct investment and unrestricted access to the markets of America and its allies.

They become the items of trade negotiations. Both need to figure out the mechanisms to enforce delivery of their commitments. America’s mechanisms have proven to be ineffective.

The most telling economic tool the US has is the power of the Dollar as the reserve currency as well as the Fed driven mechanisms to regulate the flow of funds across the globe including China. Any attempt by anyone to diminish it must be dealt with pronto and with determination.

Implications for You

Expect to hear more from Charan on this subject. He intends to have ongoing conversations about this.

For the moment, you as business leaders need to be aware of the economic war and factor it into your long-term scenario planning. There is a scenario in which the unmistakable and irreversible reset continues on its current trajectory. There is another in which the leaders of the democratic sphere actively step up before it is too late to stem the tide. The time is now for you to rethink your business and re-imagine your relevant external landscape in the context of U.S.-China economic war, inflation and the climate.

Click here for a list of my Forbes articles (of which this is #770) and a summary of my book on executive onboarding: The New Leader’s 100-Day Action Plan.

Follow me on Twitter.

Read More Articles

A large crowd of people seated closely together, viewed from behind, attending an event or presentation in a dimly lit venue.
The Stakeholders You’re Not Thinking About – And Why They Can Derail Your First 100 Days

Cracker Barrel made headlines when its relatively new CEO departed after less than two years in the role they were hired to transform. The reasons were complex, but one thread…

Read Article
A person holding a clipboard with a blank sheet of paper and a pen poised to write
Outcome-Based Governance: Aligning Policies, Guidelines, and Principles

Policies channel compliance. Guidelines invite contribution. Principles earn commitment. Start with how you want people to behave at work and then design your governance stack to reinforce, not inhibit that.  Three…

Read Article
Concept image of human brain made of blue and gray paint brushes
The Neuroscience of Leadership: Accelerating Growth Mindset and Enterprise Performance

Organizations’ futures depend less on what their people know today than on how fast they can learn, adapt, and execute tomorrow. Building on Carol Dweck’s Growth Mindset – the idea that abilities can be…

Read Article
A group of professionals collaborating.
Everything Communicates: Especially As and To an Executive Onboarding into a New Role

Everything communicates. Everything you say and don’t say, do and don’t do, and the order in which you say and do it sends a message. The same is true for everyone around you. As an executive onboarding into a…

Read Article
Group team working in a office.
Designing The Right Offsites for Different Leadership Levels

Offsites can be rocket fuel or expensive theater. One difference is whether you design each for the kind of leadership each level needs to provide: cultural, strategic, operational, or tactical. When you nest your offsites to fit those roles, you…

Read Article
Argentina flag with the body shape of the country in soccer field.
Strategic Adaptation in Leadership: Lessons from the Argentina–England World Cup Semi-Final

The Argentina–England World Cup semi-final was not just a game; it was a live case study in how leaders deploy strategy and tactics—and what happens when they fail to adjust…

Read Article