When To Discard Your Loyal Opposition

You need a meaningful level of loyal disruption, challenge, rebellion, and deviation on a team. Without it, inertia sets in. You don’t evolve. You stagnate and eventually get eaten by competition you don’t see coming. However, when your loyal opposition ceases to believe in your purpose – your mission, vision or values – it’s time to cut them loose.

As I wrote earlier in Why the Highest Performing Teams Always Fail Over Time, high performing teams need differential strengths, differential perspectives, deviation, and full spectrum creativity. You must find and nurture people with differential strengths that complement those already existing on your team, not reinforcing them. You must not push for perfect alignment of peoples’ behaviors, relationships and attitude with your existing culture.

But there’s no wiggle room on purpose. People that don’t share your mission, vision and values need to go away.

Mission: Why we are here, why we exist, what business we are in.

There are four possible attitudes to your mission: disengaged, compliant, contributing, committed.

Those disengaged, impede the mission. They don’t even pretend to be loyal opposition. They fight you and everyone pushing the mission either directly or passive aggressively at every step of the way. This is easy. Don’t let them take one more step. Make them go away now.

Those compliant, do the minimum they can get away with to survive in the organization. While you should not expect them to help you evolve, they’re not hurting you so long as they are doing tasks that don’t require more than their bare minimum.

Those contributing to the mission are your most valuable followers. Nurture them. Encourage their differential strengths, perspective and creativity. Their deviations come from a good place and are designed to contribute to the mission.

Those committed to the mission are the heart of your loyal opposition. They put mission above all else. They will challenge any perceived misstep by anyone in the organization including you. Witness Jim Whitehurst’s onboarding into Red Hat. He learned that people weren’t going to follow his direction, even though he came in as CEO. It was all about the mission. He had to earn the right to lead. And that was a great thing.

Net, lose those disengaged with the mission; keep those complying – at least for now; nurture those contributing; and cherish those committed – just so long as they agree with the vision and values.

Vision: Future picture—what we want to become, where we are going – in which others can envision themselves.

Buying into the vision means accepting it as a worthwhile outcome of the work and effort to be done. Those buying into the vision share the same view of the organization of the future. They believe in the value of what the organization is going to do.

Still, it’s entirely possible for someone to see how a vision is good for others, allows people in the organization to do what they are good at, and is good for the organization without that being the good they most care about doing, leveraging what they are good at or being good for them personally. They buy into the vision for the organization, but do not see themselves as part of that vision.

Net, those that engaged with the mission and both buy into the vision and envision themselves as part of it should stay – just so long as they share the values. Those missing one or the other should depart at some point along the journey.

Values: Things you will not compromise on the way to delivering the mission and achieving the vision.

On the one hand, this is relatively simple. If you won’t compromise the values, you can’t compromise on keeping people who will compromise the values. If you really believe in your values, the end does not justify the means.

On the other hand, it’s hard to know others’ real values. Of course, they are going to say they share your organization’s values. And most will act in line with those values. But if they do not fundamentally believe in the values, they will slip up. Look for slip ups on small things. Learn why they slipped up. If the root cause is a different view of a value, make those people go away before they slip up on big things.

Read More Articles

A large crowd of people seated closely together, viewed from behind, attending an event or presentation in a dimly lit venue.
The Stakeholders You’re Not Thinking About – And Why They Can Derail Your First 100 Days

Cracker Barrel made headlines when its relatively new CEO departed after less than two years in the role they were hired to transform. The reasons were complex, but one thread…

Read Article
A person holding a clipboard with a blank sheet of paper and a pen poised to write
Outcome-Based Governance: Aligning Policies, Guidelines, and Principles

Policies channel compliance. Guidelines invite contribution. Principles earn commitment. Start with how you want people to behave at work and then design your governance stack to reinforce, not inhibit that.  Three…

Read Article
Concept image of human brain made of blue and gray paint brushes
The Neuroscience of Leadership: Accelerating Growth Mindset and Enterprise Performance

Organizations’ futures depend less on what their people know today than on how fast they can learn, adapt, and execute tomorrow. Building on Carol Dweck’s Growth Mindset – the idea that abilities can be…

Read Article
A group of professionals collaborating.
Everything Communicates: Especially As and To an Executive Onboarding into a New Role

Everything communicates. Everything you say and don’t say, do and don’t do, and the order in which you say and do it sends a message. The same is true for everyone around you. As an executive onboarding into a…

Read Article
Group team working in a office.
Designing The Right Offsites for Different Leadership Levels

Offsites can be rocket fuel or expensive theater. One difference is whether you design each for the kind of leadership each level needs to provide: cultural, strategic, operational, or tactical. When you nest your offsites to fit those roles, you…

Read Article
Argentina flag with the body shape of the country in soccer field.
Strategic Adaptation in Leadership: Lessons from the Argentina–England World Cup Semi-Final

The Argentina–England World Cup semi-final was not just a game; it was a live case study in how leaders deploy strategy and tactics—and what happens when they fail to adjust…

Read Article