Why You Should Under Promise And Over Deliver — But Not By Too Much

Getting on the right side of delivering your forecasts is important for your business, your personal brand and your bonus. Your business needs to anticipate what to make and deliver to run effectively and efficiently. Delivering what you say you’re going to deliver impacts your personal credibility. And bonuses are given to people that over deliver. Putting all three together leads you to under promising and over delivering at the right level to enable the business, strengthen your personal brand and maximize your bonus.

Forecasting for the Business

Procter & Gamble’s Puritan Oil brand in the middle of growing 50% over two years, growing between 20 and 25% year on year every month. We provided different constituents with different forecasts.

Senior leadership got mad at us if we came in below a forecast and applauded when we beat a forecast. Every month we told them we were going to grow 10%. They were thrilled when we came in at 20-25%. Had we told them we were going to grow 25% and only grown 20% they would not have been happy. Keeping your senior leadership happy is a good thing.

Product Supply got mad at us if we sold materially less or materially more than our forecast. They cared more about accuracy than about whether we were a little over or under. Every month we sat down with them and gave them an honest projection of our most likely sales. We were generally within 5 points of our predictions which made them happy.

Think in terms of range forecasting. With senior leadership we wanted forecast the bottom of the range so we could beat the number. With Product Supply we needed to forecast the middle of the range so we could come in close to the number.

 

Forecasting to Strengthen Your Personal Brand

In general, people respect people that do what they say they are going to do. I’m sure senior leadership at Procter & Gamble knew we were running two forecasts (one for them and one for Product Supply). At some point, consistently over delivering suggests you’re sandbagging your forecast. That hurts your credibility.

There’s a special case when you’re onboarding into a new leadership role early in the operating year. In that case, you’ll inherit someone else’s plans and forecast. Our strong suggestion is to dig into that plan and forecast and understand it before you accept it as your own. Most organizations will give you a one-time chance to revise your forecast and blame the miss on your predecessor. Do that. And do that right.

  • Understand the data behind the plan and forecast.
  • Figure out where it sits on the forecast range:
    1. More likely to come in ahead of than below a “conservative” forecast.
    2. Equally likely to come in ahead or behind a “most likely “forecast.
    3. More likely to come in below than ahead of an “optimistic” forecast.
  • Revise the forecast as appropriate – knowing that few people revise a forecast far enough down the first time.

The reason people hesitate to go all the way down in revising a forecast is that that generally leads to a reduction in resources which risks becoming a vicious cycle. Under perform. Reduce resources. Under perform more. Reduce more resources. And so on.

 

Forecasting to Maximize Bonus

The math here is generally simple. The lower your forecast and plan and commitment versus what you deliver, the greater your bonus will be. What’s not to like about that?

Lots.

Under promising is bad for the business and bad for your personal brand. Too low a forecast will lead to resource constraints and potential supply problems. Too low a forecast will lead to people doubting your credibility and commitment.

Net, don’t aim to maximize your near term bonus. Aim to do what’s right for the business and your personal credibility over the near and long term. Appropriate recognition and rewards will follow over time.

 

Read More Articles

Group team working in a office.
Designing The Right Offsites for Different Leadership Levels

Offsites can be rocket fuel or expensive theater. One difference is whether you design each for the kind of leadership each level needs to provide: cultural, strategic, operational, or tactical. When you nest your offsites to fit those roles, you…

Read Article
Argentina flag with the body shape of the country in soccer field.
Strategic Adaptation in Leadership: Lessons from the Argentina–England World Cup Semi-Final

The Argentina–England World Cup semi-final was not just a game; it was a live case study in how leaders deploy strategy and tactics—and what happens when they fail to adjust…

Read Article
Confident executive standing on a modern stage, delivering a presentation
Act Like You’re Already Successful to Jump-Start Success

Success doesn’t start when you “make it.” It starts when you behave like you already have. The best leaders - whether they are taking on a new CEO role, launching…

Read Article
Picture of the Allies Normandy World War II amphibious assault D‑Day
Why Leaders Get the Followers and Decisions They Deserve

Leaders don’t simply get the followers they deserve; they get the decisions they design for. When leaders understand the different ways people create value - artistically, scientifically, and interpersonally -…

Read Article
Primegenesis Operational Leadership
The Underappreciated Power of Operational Leadership

Operational leadership is the undervalued fulcrum between theory and reality. It is where strategy stops living in slide decks, where culture becomes observable behavior, and where tactics gain the coherence…

Read Article
NBA Champions game
The Stockdale Paradox: Preparing Your Leadership Team for Adversity

Down 29 points in the third quarter of Game 4 of the 2026 NBA Finals, the New York Knicks did something that had never been done in Finals history. With…

Read Article