When to Lead, Follow, or Get Out of the Way: Leadership Lessons from the Greek Bailout

Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou is choosing to get out of the way and resign in order to save the bailout deal for his country.  Sometimes leaders need to lead.  Sometimes they need to follow.  And sometimes they need to get out of the way of the pursuit of purpose.

Whenever a leader is facing a period of change, there are going to be supporters, detractors and watchers:

  • Supporters: These are the people that share the leader’s vision and see that there’s more to gain by going forward with the new leader than by holding on to the past.
  • Detractors: These are the people who are comfortable with the status quo and have more to lose in giving up the current state than they have to gain in supporting a risky change.
  • Watchers: These are the people that are on the fence, generally the silent majority.

It is difficult to turn detractors into supporters (especially covert detractors). Instead, leaders should work to turn supporters into champions, watchers into supporters, and neutralize detractors, turning them into watchers or making them go away.

Ideal Result

The ideal result for Papandreou would have been to align the government leaders around the shared purpose of improving the well-being of the people of Greece. He could not do this, so he tried to move enough of his supporters, watchers, and detractors one step each to alter the balance of power in his favor.

Papandreou tried, but was unable to shift enough people to save the deal. If you can’t do that as a leader, it’s time to get out of the way, like Papandreou did to pave the way for what Lucas Papedemos must do as interim prime minister.

The Win

One of the issues with the Greek bailout was that some of the people did not want to give Papandreou the win, fearing that it would strengthen his hold on the government. He tried all sorts of approaches, from encouragement to bargaining to threats to calling a public referendum. None worked.

So, in the end, Papandreou agreed to give up his position, taking off the table any risk of a win strengthening his hold.

Commit to Purpose

The strongest leaders know that it’s not about them. It’s about the team, their followers, and, most importantly, the purpose of the organization (improving the wellbeing of the people of Greece in this case). Papandreou’s action is the action of a leader more committed to purpose than to his own “hold” on power.

The lesson is most definitely not that any leader facing opposition should resign. The lesson is that leaders must be committed to purpose over everything else. Had Papandreou managed to get the other governmental leaders rallied around their shared purpose and put their disagreements aside in pursuit of that, he would not have had to resign. He failed in that. And that failure is a failure of leadership.

The risk is that those that dug in and forced Papandreou’s resignation will be emboldened by their success and be even less flexible in the future. Papandreou certainly knows that. The choice he is making is to accept that risk – but do the deal required for the bailout.

This is a good example of step 9 of The New Leader’s PlaybookSecure ADEPT People in the Right Roles and Deal with Inevitable Resistance

Make your organization ever more ADEPT by Acquiring, Developing, Encouraging, Planning, and Transitioning talent:

  • Acquire: Recruit, attract, and onboard the right people
  • Develop: Assess and build skills and knowledge
  • Encourage: Direct, support, recognize, and reward
  • Plan: Monitor, assess, plan career moves over time
  • Transition: Migrate to different roles as appropriate

Just as not all people are right for all roles, not all leaders are right for all situations. We’re all new leaders all the time. As you take a look at your next 100 days, make sure you know when to lead, when to follow, and when to get out of the way.

George Papandreou via Wikipedia

Read More Articles

Why You Should Have More, Not Fewer Meetings | Meeting Effectiveness for Leaders

Meeting effectiveness is not about having fewer meetings. It is about having the right meetings, with the right people, for the right reasons, done in the right way. When leaders…

Read Article
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through

Teams fail when direction is fuzzy, resources are ambiguous, or authority is blurred. Too often, leaders assign tasks without enough context for teams to make smart, independent decisions. The result?…

Read Article
Bring Yourself to Work

There are few career inflection points more challenging, or requiring more thoughtful planning, than assuming a position of leadership. We unconsciously acquire bits of our leadership persona over the course…

Read Article
Leadership Transition Lessons from the NFL

Leadership transitions are rarely about failure. They’re about timing. They’re about trajectory. And they’re about whether an organization believes its next chapter requires a different kind of leadership than the…

Read Article
How to Elevate Executive Performance and Delegate the Rest

Most leaders are doing too much, and not enough. Too much of the wrong work, not enough of the right work. The answer is not more effort. It is leverage.…

Read Article
How You Define Success as a Leader Defines You

By Mazher Ahmad, with George Bradt Every leader eventually faces a moment that forces them to ask a deceptively simple question: What does success really mean to me? In the…

Read Article