How Early Wins Help Build A High-Performing Team

Early wins give teams confidence in themselves. This is why they are generally little wins that can be delivered early, as opposed to big wins that take more time. The general guidance is to over-invest in the early wins to accelerate them and pave the way for other wins. The key to setting this up is disciplined delegation.

Early wins are some of the building blocks of Tactical Capacity that together accelerate executive onboarding and the development of high-performing teams. Each building block has a key component. It’s important to put all the building blocks in place and even more important to focus on the key components:

  • Burning Imperative: Co-created shared purpose
  • Milestone Management: Systemic approach to learning and adapting
  • Early Wins: Disciplined delegation
  • Role Sort: Leveraging complementary strengths
  • Communication: Two ways all the time

The key to early wins is disciplined delegation, likely with some sort of team charter that lays out:

  • Inspiring Direction: Objectives/desired results/context/intent – what and why
  • Enabling Resources: Financial, information, technical or operational, people, time
  • Empowering Authority to make mission tactical decisions within strategic and operational boundaries/guidelines/intent – different than superior would have made
  • Credible Accountability and consequences (standards of performance, time expectations, positive and negative consequences of success and failure)

Team Charters

Description/Scope: Overall summary
Summary of the work’s what and why (objectives, context and intent) and guidelines and interdependencies, so all can see quickly how this work fits with others’ work.

Objectives/Goals/Desired Result: WHAT

Charge the team with delivering SMART results – what you expect the team to get done:

  • Specific – Concrete objectives and goals are easier to achieve and track.
  • Measurable – If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it.
  • Actionable/Attainable – Things they can make happen or influence (and achieve).
  • Relevant – To the overall mission, strategy, plan
  • Time-bound – Including milestones along the way.

Context and Intent: WHY

Share the information that led to objectives/goals/desired result in terms of the organization’s overall purpose, objective, strategies, positioning, values, as well as how this work fits within that and helps move things in that direction. “Need to [what], so that [why]”.

  • Provide any insights you have into customers, collaborators, culture, capabilities, conditions (constant, novel or variable) or competitors (6 Cs)
  • Get at the expected level of complication (number of parts) and complexity (predictability of parts’ interactions) of the program or project, expected risks and ways to mitigate those risks.
  • Discuss the intent behind the objectives. Explain why this matters to your customers, colleagues, you, the team, the community – key benefits.
  • Lay out what’s going to happen after objective is achieved, how others, and especially the superior team, will use the team’s output.

Approach: HOW

Resources

Lay out the human, financial, data/technical, and operational resources available. Be specific (like “25% of Murgatroyd’s time for a week)” as opposed to (“someone’s help.”)

Clarify what other teams, groups, people are supporting, dependent on, or note other teams, groups, units working in parallel, supporting or interdependent areas. Help the team understand whom they can, should, and must work with. This may or may not include a steering committee, executive sponsor/champion, program or project leader, program or project manager assisting that leader, project management (PMO) or transformation office helping enable across teams.

Authority/Guidelines/Interdependencies

Clarify what the team can and cannot do with regard to decisions, roles and approach:

  • What the team can decide on its own, what it must recommend to its approving authority, and what decisions have already been made, including mandatory executional elements.
  • Policies (that they must adhere to,) guidelines (that they should adhere to unless they have a good reason not to do so,) and principles (that should underpin all.)
  • Interdependencies between the team being chartered and the other teams involved.

Accountability: HOW KNOW

Be clear on accountability structure (RACI: Accountable, Responsible, Consulted, Informed,) update timing, completion timing. This is about how you’re going to track and measure success. In general, tasks get managed/tracked daily, projects weekly, programs monthly, and core processes annually.

  • Approving Authority: Passes accountability on to someone else, retaining approval/decision rights.
  • Accountable: Overall ownership of results. Drives decisions. Ensures implementation.
  • Responsible: Does defined work (and signs off on their portion of the work.)
  • Consulted: Provides input. (Could be advice to be considered or concurrence to be followed) – Two-way conversation.
  • Informed: Kept up-to-date – One-way communication either in advance or after the fact.

 

Read More Articles

Why You Should Have More, Not Fewer Meetings | Meeting Effectiveness for Leaders

Meeting effectiveness is not about having fewer meetings. It is about having the right meetings, with the right people, for the right reasons, done in the right way. When leaders…

Read Article
The Artistry in Communication: Where Leadership Comes Alive

Executive communication is often taught as a process of alignment — aligning messages with culture, strategy, operations, and tactical missions. That’s necessary but not sufficient. The artistry lies not in…

Read Article
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through

Teams fail when direction is fuzzy, resources are ambiguous, or authority is blurred. Too often, leaders assign tasks without enough context for teams to make smart, independent decisions. The result?…

Read Article
High Stakes Landmines for Technology Executives

By Jeff Scott with George Bradt High-stakes onboarding landmines are everywhere for new technology executives, but few are as deadly—and as fixable—as a misaligned role. Being the right technology leader…

Read Article
Preparing For The Next Point Of Inflection With Contingency And Capability Plans

The next point of inflection is coming whether you’re ready for it or not. Your success as a leader doesn’t hinge on your ability to predict the future, but on…

Read Article
The Baked Ziti Approach To Making The Implicit Explicit

Sometimes it’s best to hint at things implicitly so others can interpret as they see best. Sometimes it’s best to explain things explicitly so others can follow precise directions. And…

Read Article