Relooking At The Animal School Fable And Differential Strengths

One of my early articles for this publication was on Lessons from the Animal School Fable in Leveraging Strengths. The main point was that most of us are unbalanced. We are relatively stronger in one area than another. Over the last decade, we’ve made this thinking more sophisticated.

An adaptation of George Reavis’ fable, “The Animal School”,  originally written in 1940, when he was superintendent of the Cincinnati Public Schools:

The animals organized a school to help their children deal with the problems of the new world. And to make it easier to administer the curriculum of running, climbing, swimming and flying, they decided that all their children would take all the subjects. This produced some interesting issues.

The duck was excellent in swimming but relatively poor in running, so he devoted himself to improving his running through extra practice. Eventually, his webbed feet got so badly worn that he dropped to only average in swimming. But average was acceptable in this school so nobody worried about that, except the duck.

The rabbit had a nervous breakdown because the other animals said she looked like a rat when she jumped in the water for swimming class and all her hair got matted down.

In the climbing class, the eagle beat all the others to the top of the tree, but kept insisting on using his own method of getting there. This was unacceptable, so the eagle was severely disciplined.

And then the fish came home from school and said, “Mom, Dad, I hate school. Swimming is great. Flying is fun if they let me start in the water. But running and climbing? I don’t have any legs; and I can’t breathe out of the water.”

The fish’s parents made an appointment for her with the principal who took one look at her progress reports and decreed, “You are so far ahead of the rest of the class in swimming that we’re going to let you skip swimming classes and give you private tutoring in running and climbing.”

The fish was last seen heading for Canada to request political asylum. The moral of this story is:

Let the fish swim. Let the rabbits run. Let the eagles fly.

We don’t want a school of average ducks.

or, Play to people’s strengths.

Investing in Strengths

It’s a lesson we learn over and over again. Most of us are unbalanced. We are relatively stronger in one area than another. There is a great temptation to fix ourselves or others by investing time to improve the areas that are relatively less strong. But that’s not the way forward.

The better approach is to invest time to improve the areas that are already relatively strong, and find ways to compensate for the gaps. That could be leveraging technology or partnering with someone else. If you are relatively weak at managing operational details, partner with a strong chief operating officer. If you are relatively weak at dealing with people’s problems and issues, partner with a strong chief human resource officer. If you are relatively weak at coming up with strategies, partner with a strong chief strategy officer.

It’s true of the strengths in those areas as well. Defining strengths as innate talent + learned knowledge + practiced skills + hard-won experience + apprenticed craft-level caring and sensibilities points the way towards further development.

First, figure out how much you care. You don’t have to turn all your innate talents into strengths. And, you may want to have adequate strengths in some areas by investing in learning for knowledge and practice for skills.

Investing in experience is a greater commitment. You’ll have to put yourself in situations that will stretch you and sometimes set you up for failure. That’s the “hard-won” part of experience. It’s most valuable when it hurts.

The highest level of strength is craft-level caring and sensibilities. These are the amazing artists, scientists or interpersonal leader operating at a different level. Becoming a master craftsman requires years of apprenticeship to absorb sensibilities that can’t be learned, practiced or even experienced. It’s wonderful. It just may not be worth the time investment in all cases.

Click here for a categorized list of my Forbes articles 

Read More Articles

Why You Should Have More, Not Fewer Meetings | Meeting Effectiveness for Leaders

Meeting effectiveness is not about having fewer meetings. It is about having the right meetings, with the right people, for the right reasons, done in the right way. When leaders…

Read Article
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through

Teams fail when direction is fuzzy, resources are ambiguous, or authority is blurred. Too often, leaders assign tasks without enough context for teams to make smart, independent decisions. The result?…

Read Article
Bring Yourself to Work

There are few career inflection points more challenging, or requiring more thoughtful planning, than assuming a position of leadership. We unconsciously acquire bits of our leadership persona over the course…

Read Article
Leadership Transition Lessons from the NFL

Leadership transitions are rarely about failure. They’re about timing. They’re about trajectory. And they’re about whether an organization believes its next chapter requires a different kind of leadership than the…

Read Article
How to Elevate Executive Performance and Delegate the Rest

Most leaders are doing too much, and not enough. Too much of the wrong work, not enough of the right work. The answer is not more effort. It is leverage.…

Read Article
How You Define Success as a Leader Defines You

By Mazher Ahmad, with George Bradt Every leader eventually faces a moment that forces them to ask a deceptively simple question: What does success really mean to me? In the…

Read Article