Why The Job Interview Strengths Question Requires Talent, Knowledge, Skills, Experience, and Craft

There are three and only three, job interview questions getting at 1) motivation, 2) strengths and 3) fit. Gallup suggests strengths are made up of talent, knowledge and skills. Adding experience and craft takes that to a different, even more useful level.

 

  • Innate talent – either born with or not
  • Learned knowledge – from books, classes or training
  • Practiced skills – from deliberate repetition
  • Hard-won experience – digested from real-world mistakes
  • Apprenticed craft – absorbed from masters with artistic care and sensibilities

 

Every interview question you’ve ever been asked or ever asked anyone is a subset of:

 

  1. Will you love the job? (Motivation)
  2. Can you do the job? (Strengths)
  3. Can we tolerate working with you? (Fit)

 

The good news is that there are only three possible answers. The bad news is that those answers require pre-work to think through and communicate how:

 

  1. Your motivation lines up with what their organization is looking for in terms of doing good for others, doing things you are good at and doing good for yourself.
  2. Your particular strengths align with those needed to be successful in the particular job they are filling.
  3. Your personal preferences across behaviors, relationships, attitudes, values and environment fit the culture of their organization.

 

Different strengths for different types of organizations

The core nature of successful organizations is either design, produce, deliver or service.

 

Production- or delivery-focused organizations win by making or delivering things that are at least as good as other alternatives at a lower cost in terms of money, time, stress or the like. This requires particular strengths in the disciplines required to work in organizations marked by stability, results, authority, order and safety. Talent, knowledge, skills and experience matter.

Design- or service-focused organizations win with how their designs or services make their customers feel. Ultimately that feeling is created by people working their craft to provide things that delight customers. They need craft-level artistic caring and sensibilities to understand customers’ hopes and desires in this ever-changing world. Thus, they need talent, knowledge, skills, experience and craft.

This lines up with the thinking behind the three types of leaders the world needs most:

 

  • Interpersonal leaders look at context, care about the cause, win by rallying the team, influence others’ hearts and impact actions.
  • Scientific leaders look at problems, care about solutions, win with better thinking, influence others’ minds and impact knowledge.
  • Artistic leaders think in terms of media, care about perceptions, win with new approaches, influence others’ souls and impact feelings.

 

Don’t misinterpret the point. All organizations design, produce, sell, deliver and service. All organizations need interpersonal, scientific and artistic leaders. All animals are created equal. It’s just that in production and delivery focused organizations, the scientific problem-solving leaders are more equal; and in design and service focused organizations, the artistic leaders impacting feelings are more equal.

 

Implications for interviews

The best interviews are exercises in joint problem-solving. The problem to be solved is whether it’s best for the organization and for the interviewee to join up. It’s as counter-productive for the interviewer to fool the interviewee about the nature, strategy and culture of the organization as it is for the interviewee to fool the interviewer about their true underlying motivation, strengths and cultural preferences.

Together, the interviewer and interviewee should explore examples that illustrate the interviewee’s:

 

  • Fundamental motivation (Ideally the first question.)
  • Appropriate innate talent
  • Knowledge of relevant areas
  • Useful skills
  • Experience that will help them deal with expected opportunities and issues
  • Craft-level artistic care and sensibilities (for design- or service-oriented roles)
  • Preferred behaviors, relationships, attitudes, values and environment

 

Implications for talent development

By now you’ve figured out this goes well beyond initial job interviews. Weave these ideas into your talent development plans. You can’t change innate talent. But you can develop your people for potential future roles by giving them opportunities to:

 

  • learn and acquire knowledge through books, classes or training
  • practice skills with deliberate repetition
  • gain relevant experience by digesting mistakes made in projects and assignments
  • nurture their artistic caring and sensibilities as apprentices to masters

 

Click here for a list of my Forbes articles (of which this is #740) and a summary of my book on executive onboarding: The New Leader’s 100-Day Action Plan.

Follow me on Twitter.

Read More Articles

Why You Should Have More, Not Fewer Meetings | Meeting Effectiveness for Leaders

Meeting effectiveness is not about having fewer meetings. It is about having the right meetings, with the right people, for the right reasons, done in the right way. When leaders…

Read Article
The Artistry in Communication: Where Leadership Comes Alive

Executive communication is often taught as a process of alignment — aligning messages with culture, strategy, operations, and tactical missions. That’s necessary but not sufficient. The artistry lies not in…

Read Article
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through

Teams fail when direction is fuzzy, resources are ambiguous, or authority is blurred. Too often, leaders assign tasks without enough context for teams to make smart, independent decisions. The result?…

Read Article
High Stakes Landmines for Technology Executives

By Jeff Scott with George Bradt High-stakes onboarding landmines are everywhere for new technology executives, but few are as deadly—and as fixable—as a misaligned role. Being the right technology leader…

Read Article
Preparing For The Next Point Of Inflection With Contingency And Capability Plans

The next point of inflection is coming whether you’re ready for it or not. Your success as a leader doesn’t hinge on your ability to predict the future, but on…

Read Article
The Baked Ziti Approach To Making The Implicit Explicit

Sometimes it’s best to hint at things implicitly so others can interpret as they see best. Sometimes it’s best to explain things explicitly so others can follow precise directions. And…

Read Article