How Best To Engage Remote Attendees In Blended Remote/In-Person Meetings

Don’t. As people return to their offices after the pandemic, some will try blended remote/in-person meetings. They will fail. Those remote will feel like second-class citizens struggling to keep up with what’s going on. Instead, pick one and structure either 100% in-person or 100% remote meetings with pre-work, agenda items geared to learning, contribution and decision-making, and disciplined follow-up, skipping the blended meetings entirely.

My wife had a rule for our dinner parties when we lived in Cincinnati: People associated with Procter & Gamble had to make up either 50% or less of the attendees or all of the attendees. They could never outnumber the non-P&G people and make them feel left out.

It works both ways when it comes to remote or in-person.

When a meeting is predominantly in-person, those joining remotely inevitably miss some of the conversation in the room – especially when more than one person is speaking at the same time. (Which, of course, never happens in any of your meetings.) And they miss all the side conversations during the meeting and during breaks. It’s physically impossible for them to get as much out of meetings as do those in-person.

Conversely, if the meeting is predominantly remote, the remote people each have their own screen and camera, while the in-person people share them. Those attending in-person have to fight with the other people in the room for air time.

This suggests first prize is to have everyone in-person. Second prize is to have everyone remote. This means the people actually in the office should still each join as they would remotely. There is no third prize. Blended meetings are doomed to fail.

Note connecting two live meetings does work, as all are on equal footings.

 

Disciplined Structure

In any case, structure meetings with pre-work, agenda items geared to learning, contribution and decision-making, and disciplined follow-up.

Note the level of structure required increases with the number of people in the meeting, complexity of agenda items, and time constraints.

At least, have an objective and agenda. At the most complex, follow the prescription from my earlier article on curating level three sense-making meetings.

 

Pre-work

Pre-work allows you to flip the classroom, minimize time presenting and absorbing, and maximize time learning, contributing and deciding. This is the first place where those remote can influence in-person meetings by going through the pre-work and providing their input before the actual meeting.

Note pre-work is essential for introverts. It doesn’t have to be long, in-depth, or complicated. It just has to be enough for them to collect their own thoughts in advance.

 

Agenda

The agenda should make the overall objective for the meeting clear to attendees and whether they should be learning, contributing or deciding during each part of the meeting.

Remote meetings are more efficient, saving on travel time and cost. One of the advantages of this is that you can spread bigger, more complex remote meetings and their breakouts over several days, allowing people to get other things done between the meeting sections and reflect on the ideas over time – especially valuable for the introverts in the group. Keep remote breakouts to four people or less to give them a chance to engage in deeper conversations on particular items.

In person meetings are more effective for humans working together/interdependently. This is because people can use all five of their senses (sight, hearing, touch, smell, taste) triggering different responses and picking up on nuances. Additionally, they can engage in side conversations during breaks, going to different layers and adjacent subjects.

As you bring people together for the first post-pandemic live meeting:

 

  • Allow ample time for people to reconnect before trying to accomplish anything else (a la one Procter & Gamble alumni reunion’s six hour opening reception)
  • Have a bias to flexible agendas to explore and co-create vs converge and decide. This is one of the times where you care more about the interactions than the actual output.

 

Follow up

Follow-up turns some meetings from theoretically elegant and practically useless to truly value-creating. Get the notes out quickly, partly so those remote and introverts can weigh in with their additional thoughts, and partly to kick-off and coordinate value-creating actions based on the decisions you made.

Read More Articles

Primegenesis blog leadership executive onboarding
The Counterintuitive Advantage of Panicking Early

Panicking is bad. But panicking early is good because that means you won’t panic later. And therein lies the counterintuitive advantage of panicking early – those who panic early never…

Read Article
Why You Should Have More, Not Fewer Meetings | Meeting Effectiveness for Leaders

Meeting effectiveness is not about having fewer meetings. It is about having the right meetings, with the right people, for the right reasons, done in the right way. When leaders…

Read Article
The Artistry in Communication: Where Leadership Comes Alive

Executive communication is often taught as a process of alignment — aligning messages with culture, strategy, operations, and tactical missions. That’s necessary but not sufficient. The artistry lies not in…

Read Article
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through

Teams fail when direction is fuzzy, resources are ambiguous, or authority is blurred. Too often, leaders assign tasks without enough context for teams to make smart, independent decisions. The result?…

Read Article
Bring Yourself to Work

There are few career inflection points more challenging, or requiring more thoughtful planning, than assuming a position of leadership. We unconsciously acquire bits of our leadership persona over the course…

Read Article
Leadership Transition Lessons from the NFL

Leadership transitions are rarely about failure. They’re about timing. They’re about trajectory. And they’re about whether an organization believes its next chapter requires a different kind of leadership than the…

Read Article