Why Optionality Is Key To Post-Pandemic Planning

In normal times, leaders can choose between three strategic postures: shape, adapt, or reserve the right to play. However, for the vast majority of organizations, the only viable posture coming out of the pandemic is the third, reserving the right to play, keeping their options open. The virus has shown itself resistant to shaping. Those trying to adapt after the pandemic will find themselves trailing the leaders for a very long time.

So, think through the potential scenarios and invest the resources required to reserve your right to play and get out of the starting blocks early once you know which scenario is coming true.

Those successfully shaping a market get to make the market’s rules, limiting others’ degrees of freedom. Witness Apple, effectively creating the smart phone market and reaping unfair returns for literally decades.

Those choosing a fast-follow or adapting strategic posture choose to let others innovate and then leverage their own strengths to build their business once they know which way the wind is blowing. Coca-Cola, for example, has been a fast-follower in new beverages. They let others pave the way and then either buy them or run a similar beverage through their superior manufacturing and distribution system as soon as those new beverages are ready to scale.

These approaches work when customers, collaborators, capabilities, competitors and conditions are behaving normally so people can make rational predictions of what’s going to happen.

That is most definitely not the case now. The only thing you can even come close to controlling is your own capabilities. Fauci expects vaccines to be widely available by April. But that’s just his current best estimate. The virus is controlling conditions. No one really knows how it will mutate and play out. And no one knows how your customers, collaborators and competitors are going to adapt to those changing conditions.

Scenario Planning

Of course, you want to do scenario planning. But all these unknowns will make the scenario planning coming out of the pandemic materially different than what you did going in.

Going into the pandemic, well-run organizations laid out what they thought were the most likely, best, and worst-case scenarios. They then quickly cut and reallocated resources to enable them to survive the worst-case scenario, building back as they could.

If you do the same coming out of the pandemic, you run the risk of getting caught in the middle.

  • Those that bet right and re-build the right capabilities in the right place at the right time will shape the market and reap out-sized rewards.
  • Those that bet wrong and re-build too many capabilities in the wrong places will suffer material financial losses.
  • Those that choose not to ramp up resources until they have more certainty will neither reap “bet right” rewards nor suffer with those that bet wrong. But they won’t be able to meet increasing demand and will lose market share – over time.

Keeping your options open

Options have a price. The thesis is that, in this case, you’re better off having a call option on resources than you are either ramping them up ahead of time or waiting.

If you are a design/innovation-focused organization, secure your options by keeping your 1st level designers engaged and having those skilled at commercializing those ideas on call. This may involve putting outside developers on low-level retainers so they’ll be available when you need them.

If you are production-focused, you need to keep supply-chain, production, and distribution options open. You may literally want to purchase commodity options so you ensure your supply, knowing you can walk away from those options as required. You may want to have a skeleton crew keeping your plants running or have contract manufacturers on retainer.

If you are distribution-focused, you’ve likely built a web of alliances already. You do need to make sure enough of your allies survive the pandemic for your entire eco-system to continue to function. If you’re not sure they are going to survive, you may want to bring in some other redundant allies just-in-case.

If you are service-focused, you can preserve options by ensuring you’ve got people indoctrinated in your culture and trained on your delivery before they are needed. In this case, you’re buying an option by investing in onboarding, socialization and training ahead of the concrete need.

Click here for a list of my Forbes articles (of which this is #671) and a summary of my book on executive onboarding: The New Leader’s 100-Day Action Plan

Read More Articles

NBA Champions game
The Stockdale Paradox: Preparing Your Leadership Team for Adversity

Down 29 points in the third quarter of Game 4 of the 2026 NBA Finals, the New York Knicks did something that had never been done in Finals history. With…

Read Article
Building Accountability in High-Performing Teams: From Slogan to Commitment

Turning empowerment from a slogan into a mutual agreement and engagement from an attitude into observable commitment  Almost every leader says they want empowered people. Almost every employee says they…

Read Article
Clear road
What To Do When Others Don’t Do What They Said They Would Do

One of the most predictable realities is that not everyone does what they said they are going to do - and even fewer do it when they said they would…

Read Article
Board meeting with the CEO
Why the Best CEOs Start Board Meetings With One Simple Sentence

Most board meetings don’t fail because of bad data. They fail because of unclear expectations—especially about how directors should feel when they leave the room. Too often, management teams present…

Read Article
White-water rafting team navigating strong river rapids with teamwork and coordination.
Recalibrating Your Own BRAVE Leadership in Turbulent Times

Leadership is most effective when it turns other‑focused intent into disciplined, everyday action in an ever-changing world. Take this moment to recalibrate how you are leading to sharpen both your…

Read Article
Team meeting
The Hierarchy of High Performance: Defining Ways of Working by Level

Use this approach to make your ways of working more disciplined, consistent, and effective by level, remit and choices, and systems and tools: Level, Remit and Choices:  Board – governance…

Read Article