The Time Management Flip – Enable Others Before Doing Your Own Work

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”3.22″][et_pb_row _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.27.4″ link_option_url=”https://www.forbes.com/sites/georgebradt/2019/06/04/get-an-early-read-on-how-your-new-boss-manages/#72c0033a4056″ link_option_url_new_window=”on”]

The time management flip comes in the instant at which your greatest leverage switches from making the best use of your own time to helping your team members make the best use of their time.

As a senior leader, leverage comes from your team. Success is no longer based on what you do yourself, but, rather, on what you inspire, enable, and empower in others. This is why individual contributors, managers, and leaders must think about time management differently, with

 

  • Individual contributors making the best use of their own time,
  • Managers directing subordinates’ tactical adjustments,
  • Senior leaders inspiring, enabling, and empowering others.

 

I started my career as a sales representative. I became adept at time management, sorting my call plans to maximize calls with my most productive customers, mapping out my days to minimize my travel time, mapping out my time in store to make my limited time with buyers as productive as possible.

Then I took over a sales unit. In an instant my greatest leverage switched from managing my own time to helping the people that worked for me manage their time. After that flip I spent my time helping them make tactical adjustments to sort their call plans, and map out their days and store visits.

There’s a second flip between manager and leader. That flip is the difference between Strategos and Taktikos. Strategos is the art of the general – arranging forces before the battle. Taktikos is about deploying forces in the battle. As a manager, my job was to maximize the tactical use of my scarce resources (salespeople’s time) to pursue objectives set for us by others. The generals, or senior leaders, had made the strategic choice to have their own sales force physically calling on stores in the first place.

Putting this into the delegation framework described in my article, The Art of Delegating:

 

  1. Do well yourself – Individual contributors’ main area of focus
  2. Do yourself, but just well enough – Individual contributors
  3. Delegate and supervise – The realm of managers
  4. Delegate and trust – Senior leaders enabling and empowering managers
  5. Do later – Senior leaders’ prioritization/deprioritization saving others time now
  6. Do never – Senior leaders’ ultimate deprioritization, saving others time and attention

 

As a leader, distance yourself from the first three levels of doing and supervising as much as practical. The more people in your organization, the less you should do yourself and the more you should delegate. Senior leaders should do only a very few things themselves. The most effective CEOs keep ownership of only one or maybe two mission-critical things at a time and delegate the rest.

Level four, “delegate and trust” choices are about giving someone else the accountability to get things done, the resources they need, and the authority to make tactical choices within the strategic bounds you’ve set. This is real empowerment. It only works if you have confidence in your lieutenants. If you don’t, replace them.

Level five, do later, choices are temporary reprieves for the important but not urgent. Team members can refocus their time, though not all their attention because they want to be ready for “later.” “Do later” projects aren’t bad ideas. They’re just not priorities now.

Level six choices not to do something ever are permanent time savers. Team members can focus all their time and attention on more important things, banishing the “something else” from their minds forever. Some of these are bad ideas. My partner Harry Kangis suggests that choosing not to pursue bad ideas is easy. The hard choice is choosing not to do something that’s a good idea – for someone else.

Net, think leverage, not efficiency. Flip the order. Do things to enable and empower others to do “their” work before you do “your” work. Make the strategic choices, creating and allocating resources. Give them clear direction, accountability, boundaries, and authority. Then, get out of the way. “Your” work will contract over time as you delegate and ignore more.

Click here for a list of my Forbes articles and a summary of my book on executive onboarding: The New Leader’s 100-Day Action Plan.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

Read More Articles

Primegenesis blog leadership executive onboarding
The Counterintuitive Advantage of Panicking Early

Panicking is bad. But panicking early is good because that means you won’t panic later. And therein lies the counterintuitive advantage of panicking early – those who panic early never…

Read Article
Why You Should Have More, Not Fewer Meetings | Meeting Effectiveness for Leaders

Meeting effectiveness is not about having fewer meetings. It is about having the right meetings, with the right people, for the right reasons, done in the right way. When leaders…

Read Article
The Artistry in Communication: Where Leadership Comes Alive

Executive communication is often taught as a process of alignment — aligning messages with culture, strategy, operations, and tactical missions. That’s necessary but not sufficient. The artistry lies not in…

Read Article
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through

Teams fail when direction is fuzzy, resources are ambiguous, or authority is blurred. Too often, leaders assign tasks without enough context for teams to make smart, independent decisions. The result?…

Read Article
Bring Yourself to Work

There are few career inflection points more challenging, or requiring more thoughtful planning, than assuming a position of leadership. We unconsciously acquire bits of our leadership persona over the course…

Read Article
Leadership Transition Lessons from the NFL

Leadership transitions are rarely about failure. They’re about timing. They’re about trajectory. And they’re about whether an organization believes its next chapter requires a different kind of leadership than the…

Read Article