Why You Must Cut Your Losses To Invest In Your Winners

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”3.22″][et_pb_row _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.27.4″]

“No one should be ashamed to admit they were wrong, which is but saying, in other words, that they are wiser today than they were yesterday.” – Alexander Pope

Rationally you all know to do this. But emotionally, it’s hard to admit defeat and cut your losses. Virtually every analysis comes up with the same conclusion. You, your team, your organization, your customers, and the world itself will be better off the faster and more decisively you can cut your losses to free up resources to invest more in your winners to make them best in class.

This is true when it comes to failing projects. Don’t try to fix them. Shut them down and turn your attention to the ones that are working.

This is true when it comes to failing people. Don’t try to fix them. Make them go away so they can be successful somewhere else and you can turn your attention to people that are succeeding on your team in your organization,

This is true when it comes to failing businesses and organizations. Don’t try to fix them. Close them and turn your attention to ones that are working.

This is true for customers you are failing. Don’t try to fix the situation. Let them play with others that can serve them better and turn your attention to customers you can delight.

It’s one of the first lessons Procter & Gamble used to teach its marketing managers. Given the choice of investing incremental marketing funds into a market in which the brand has a 5% share versus a 50% share, it’s almost always more productive to invest in the 50% share market. A 10% bump in a 5% market gives you and extra half a share point. The same 10% bump in a 50% market gives you +5 share points.

Experienced leaders #1 regret is not moving fast enough on people. Too many managers invest too much time either trying to save poor performing employees or making sure they are treated fairly on the way out. You’ve seen this.

 

  1. Employee’s performance is poor.
  2. They are warned.
  3. Performance stays poor for the next three months.
  4. They are put on a “performance improvement” program and given extra attention and coaching over a three-month period.
  5. Performance stays poor.
  6. They are put on final notice and given three months to fix their problems or exit.

 

Did you do the math? It’s almost a year of poor performance and several months of extra investment in time by the manager.

Assume 70% of a manager’s employees are doing fine, 10% are doing an outstanding job and 20% are doing poorly. If the manager has to invest extra time in those doing poorly, that manager is going to spend less time with those doing outstanding. But that’s where there’s the most leverage to the manager’s investment of time. The difference between something being world class (parity) and truly best in class (superior) is exponential.

Implications

This is the essence of strategy. Strategy is about the creation and allocation of resources to the right place in the right way at the right time over time. While it’s relatively hard to create resources – especially time – it’s relatively easy to reallocate resources, moving them from places where they have less leverage to places where they have more leverage.

Porter told us that strategy is choosing what not to do. You can’t decide to focus on something without choosing not to focus on something else.

The place to focus is on your winners. The “something else” to downplay is your losers.

Actions

 

  1. Make a brutally honest assessment of your winners and losers. Expect three categories: clear winners, clear losers, and yet to be determined.
  2. Cut your losses on the losers. Shut down failing projects. Move failing people. Close failing businesses and organizations. Fire customers you’re failing.
  3. Redeploy your resources to the winners. Accelerate winning projects. Invest more in winning people, businesses and organizations. Give your best customers even more love and attention.

 

Scale this by looking at everything through the eyes of your purpose/why, utilizing and reinforcing a clear framework on how to think about this/how, and incentivizing people for doing the right thing/what – explicitly including admitting defeat.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

Read More Articles

A large crowd of people seated closely together, viewed from behind, attending an event or presentation in a dimly lit venue.
The Stakeholders You’re Not Thinking About – And Why They Can Derail Your First 100 Days

Cracker Barrel made headlines when its relatively new CEO departed after less than two years in the role they were hired to transform. The reasons were complex, but one thread…

Read Article
A person holding a clipboard with a blank sheet of paper and a pen poised to write
Outcome-Based Governance: Aligning Policies, Guidelines, and Principles

Policies channel compliance. Guidelines invite contribution. Principles earn commitment. Start with how you want people to behave at work and then design your governance stack to reinforce, not inhibit that.  Three…

Read Article
Concept image of human brain made of blue and gray paint brushes
The Neuroscience of Leadership: Accelerating Growth Mindset and Enterprise Performance

Organizations’ futures depend less on what their people know today than on how fast they can learn, adapt, and execute tomorrow. Building on Carol Dweck’s Growth Mindset – the idea that abilities can be…

Read Article
A group of professionals collaborating.
Everything Communicates: Especially As and To an Executive Onboarding into a New Role

Everything communicates. Everything you say and don’t say, do and don’t do, and the order in which you say and do it sends a message. The same is true for everyone around you. As an executive onboarding into a…

Read Article
Group team working in a office.
Designing The Right Offsites for Different Leadership Levels

Offsites can be rocket fuel or expensive theater. One difference is whether you design each for the kind of leadership each level needs to provide: cultural, strategic, operational, or tactical. When you nest your offsites to fit those roles, you…

Read Article
Argentina flag with the body shape of the country in soccer field.
Strategic Adaptation in Leadership: Lessons from the Argentina–England World Cup Semi-Final

The Argentina–England World Cup semi-final was not just a game; it was a live case study in how leaders deploy strategy and tactics—and what happens when they fail to adjust…

Read Article