Questioning The Value Of Integrity

integrity leadership

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” _builder_version=”3.22″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.27.4″ module_alignment=”left” link_option_url_new_window=”on”]

It’s about what you want and what you’re willing to give up to get it. And recently, it seems more and more leaders are willing to give up integrity for their own personal gain. Has to make you wonder if integrity is a barrier or an asset. I’m hoping it’s the latter, but it’s worth considering.

Let’s start with a framework of grounded, stretching, and untethered leaders.

Grounded leaders accept current reality and existing rules. They work towards highly probable future states.

Stretching leaders understand that the current reality is open to interpretation. They accept that different people with different perspectives may see the same things differently. They imagine and share possible future states with new rules.

Untethered leaders make up their own current truths and present made up future states untethered from any accepted norms, rules or laws of physics.

The critical difference is integrity, which Merriam-Webster defines as “firm adherence to a code of especially moral or artistic values.”

Grounded leaders accept the truth of the current reality for what it is.

Stretching leaders push the edges of that truth without violating generally accepted codes or values.

Untethered leaders do not see themselves as tethered or bound to anyone else’s truths, codes, values, needs, wants or desires. For them, if they think it, want it and it’s good for them personally, it must be true.

Consider, for example, a manufacturing plant running at 80% of capacity with its employees working four shifts out of a possible five each per week. There’s a sudden influx of orders and the plant manager is asked to produce 25% more the next week.

Grounded plant managers realize they can pay their employees for another shift, get to 100% of capacity and deliver the required output.

Stretching plant managers run incentive contests to persuade everyone to stretch 25% more, rewarding them for their over-delivery and encouraging them to sacrifice some breaks along the way in pursuit of the incentive.

Untethered plant managers simply tell everyone to produce 25% more, assuming they can, and completely ignoring the rule that scope is a function of resources and time. Further, they will claim the 25% increase, whether or not it actually happens.

Here’s the rub. Untethered plant managers’ approach results in the highest operating margins over the short-term – at least on paper. Those managers add neither time nor incentives while claiming to deliver the desired result.

You know people in each of these categories. You know you can count on the reliably grounded managers. You know stretching managers will deliver sometimes and fall short sometimes, but always stretch to do their best and to get the best out of their teams. And you know not to trust the untethered managers.

And yet, we see leader after leader claiming things that simply aren’t true and promising things that will never come true. We see leaders ignoring facts to make up and tell whatever story they want to tell. We see leaders repeating those made up stories to pound people into giving in to their way. We see them winning financial, promotion and other prizes.

At some point, these individual, aberrant behaviors become the new norm. Some say your real values are defined by what you choose to walk by. Everytime we ignore someone propagating their own truth or delusional promise, we implicitly accept them.

This is classic game theory. What’s right for any individual may not be right for the broader group. If integrity matters to us, we need to change the balance of consequences for the untethered with the broader group working together to root out unacceptable aberrations.

Net, we can’t stop each and every individual from valuing achievement over integrity. But if we don’t stop enough of them, that will become the new norm. That’s not who we are. Let’s hope it’s not who we become.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

Read More Articles

A large crowd of people seated closely together, viewed from behind, attending an event or presentation in a dimly lit venue.
The Stakeholders You’re Not Thinking About – And Why They Can Derail Your First 100 Days

Cracker Barrel made headlines when its relatively new CEO departed after less than two years in the role they were hired to transform. The reasons were complex, but one thread…

Read Article
A person holding a clipboard with a blank sheet of paper and a pen poised to write
Outcome-Based Governance: Aligning Policies, Guidelines, and Principles

Policies channel compliance. Guidelines invite contribution. Principles earn commitment. Start with how you want people to behave at work and then design your governance stack to reinforce, not inhibit that.  Three…

Read Article
Concept image of human brain made of blue and gray paint brushes
The Neuroscience of Leadership: Accelerating Growth Mindset and Enterprise Performance

Organizations’ futures depend less on what their people know today than on how fast they can learn, adapt, and execute tomorrow. Building on Carol Dweck’s Growth Mindset – the idea that abilities can be…

Read Article
A group of professionals collaborating.
Everything Communicates: Especially As and To an Executive Onboarding into a New Role

Everything communicates. Everything you say and don’t say, do and don’t do, and the order in which you say and do it sends a message. The same is true for everyone around you. As an executive onboarding into a…

Read Article
Argentina flag with the body shape of the country in soccer field.
Strategic Adaptation in Leadership: Lessons from the Argentina–England World Cup Semi-Final

The Argentina–England World Cup semi-final was not just a game; it was a live case study in how leaders deploy strategy and tactics—and what happens when they fail to adjust…

Read Article
Picture of the Allies Normandy World War II amphibious assault D‑Day
Why Leaders Get the Followers and Decisions They Deserve

Leaders don’t simply get the followers they deserve; they get the decisions they design for. When leaders understand the different ways people create value - artistically, scientifically, and interpersonally -…

Read Article