Burning Imperative in Context

"…a Burning Imperative is different than a Shared Purpose. The difference between the two is really in the element of timing. The Shared Purpose drives the long term while your Burning Imperative drives the next phase of activity on the way to the long term.  Remember the Apollo 13 example of “get these men home alive”.  Clear.  Sharply defined.  Intensely shared.  Purposefully urgent.  It trumps all petty concerns.  It didn’t replace the overall shared purpose of exploring the universe to increase man’s knowledge.  The Burning Imperative moves the team forward on the way to that longer term Shared Purpose.  That’s what you’re aiming for." (1)

Timing matters

Consider the linkage between purpose, objectives and goals, and actions.

  • Purpose gets at the long-term settled, determination.  Everything else nests within purpose.
  • Objectives and goals are tangible things to be achieved or delivered over a defined time period.
  • Actions move things forward towards objectives and goals in line with purpose

These can be linked by intentions and milestones.

  • Intentions link objectives to purpose so people know why the objectives are important
  • Milestones are steps along the way to objectives, linking actions to objectives

When you put this all together, the Burning Imperative is a way to clarify everyones intentions, leveraging milestones to drive actions in line with purposefully urgent objectives and goals.
 

George Bradt – PrimeGenesis Executive Onboarding and Transition Acceleration

 

(1) excerpt from The New Leader's 100-Day Action Plan – Bradt, Check, Pedraza – Wiley, 2009

Read More Articles

Two martial man engaging in a judo combat
Deploying Judo Strategy To Throw A Stronger Business Competitor

In judo, you do not try to overpower a stronger opponent. You accept their strength, side-step their thrust, and use their weight and momentum to throw them. My earlier article,…

Read Article
A rugged expedition vehicle drives along a long, empty road toward lush mountains under a dramatic sky.
Deliberately Stupid Executive Onboarding

Every executive walking into a new role is, for a while, stupid. Not incapable. Not unqualified. Stupid in the specific, unavoidable sense that they do not yet know what they…

Read Article
A group of executives in a meeting, getting to know each other and working together.
Succeeding Your Own Boss

There's a version of executive onboarding that almost never gets written about, probably because it looks so easy from the outside. Whether it’s the CFO succeeding the CEO, or the…

Read Article
Functional Leader Onboarding: Converge Before You Evolve

The fastest way for a new functional or operational leader to fail is to start changing the team before becoming part of it. The better sequence is simpler and harder: converge first,…

Read Article
Integration Leadership Isn’t a Detail. It’s the Deal.

KKR's $5.7 billion agreement to acquire Integer Holdings closed a strategic review that started back in April. The medtech manufacturer's board ran the process. Advisors ran the numbers. Lawyers ran…

Read Article
In M&A Integration, Culture Isn’t the Soft Part. It’s the Job.

Private equity has been on a buying spree. Bolt-on acquisitions, platform builds, roll-ups across logistics, healthcare, professional services, and beyond. Deal teams have gotten faster and more disciplined about diligence,…

Read Article