Why It’s Better To Knock Down Walls Later When You Start A New Job

Knocking down walls getty

In our early moves we tended to knock down walls quickly. Over time, we learned the advantage of living in a house for a while before doing that. The same is true for executives moving into new roles. Early on they tend to knock down walls or reorganize quickly. Over time, they learn the advantage of converging into the organization before trying to evolve it.

Knocking down walls in houses

From most to less aggressive were the houses we bought and 1) completely leveled before ever going in, 2) took out the wall between the kitchen and dining room before moving in, 3) knocked a hole from the kitchen to a bedroom and turned the bedroom into a play room for our kids our first weekend in the house.

Then we got wiser and lived in a house for a few years before having someone else design and build an extension. There were a couple of good aspects to this including getting to know the house before we changed it, and having someone else do what they were expert at and we were not.

The point is not so much that we were right or wrong in what we did, but that different situations suggested different actions.

The land under the house we leveled was worth more without the house on it than with the house on it. That was easy.

The kitchen and dining room were each too small for our needs in the second house.

And our kids were so small we needed easy access to them in the third house.

We’ve lived in our current house for two decades. We had time to learn about it before changing it and made the changes for the long term.

Reorganizing organizations

“Every time we were beginning to form up into teams, we would be reorganized.  I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet new situations by reorganizing… and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency, and demoralization.”

  • Gaius Petronius, A.D. 65, Roman governor and advisor (arbiter) to Nero per Frank Price in “Right Every Time” – Marcel Deckker publishing

Every organization needs a reorganization at some point. The questions to ask are when and how much.

The ACES framework is a good place to start.

The combination of a strong need to change and not being ready to change suggests new leaders need to shock the organization. This is when you consider leveling the house or making major changes early on.

When there’s less need to change right now and the organization is ready enough to change on its own, you can just assimilate in. Unfortunately, this is not what most new leaders find.

The other two boxes are the more likely cases. In these cases, converging first and then evolving later makes sense. Live in the house for a while before moving walls. See how things really work – especially behind the scenes. This way you’re more likely to understand the unintended consequences of reorganizing before you do it.

Structure follow strategy

When you are ready to reorganize, take the learning from Peter Drucker that structure should follow strategy.

  1. Get clear on where you’re going to play and how you’re going to win – your strategy.
  2. Figure out the organizational capabilities you’ll need to have to win.
  3. Structure in a way that best inspires, enables and empowers people to leverage their own and others’ capabilities together in support of the strategy.

Think in terms of Nested Leadership, so you’re structuring in a way that takes into account the important differences and interactions between nested leadership at cultural, strategic and tactical levels.

  • Cultural leadership: Who you are and what you stand for
  • Strategic leadership: Arranging resources before deployment
  • Tactical leadership: Deploying and adjusting resources in real time

Make sure people get the balance of mandatories and flexibility right. Your cultural leaders can’t compromise. They need to insist that everyone reflect the culture in everything they say and do. Your strategic leaders must nest their broad directional choices within the culture while making sure everyone is clear on the intent and their degrees of freedom. And. your tactical leaders must ground themselves in the culture and strategy, and then have the confidence to make the tactical decisions required to adapt to changing circumstances with agility in real time.

Read More Articles

Why You Should Have More, Not Fewer Meetings | Meeting Effectiveness for Leaders

Meeting effectiveness is not about having fewer meetings. It is about having the right meetings, with the right people, for the right reasons, done in the right way. When leaders…

Read Article
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through

Teams fail when direction is fuzzy, resources are ambiguous, or authority is blurred. Too often, leaders assign tasks without enough context for teams to make smart, independent decisions. The result?…

Read Article
Bring Yourself to Work

There are few career inflection points more challenging, or requiring more thoughtful planning, than assuming a position of leadership. We unconsciously acquire bits of our leadership persona over the course…

Read Article
Leadership Transition Lessons from the NFL

Leadership transitions are rarely about failure. They’re about timing. They’re about trajectory. And they’re about whether an organization believes its next chapter requires a different kind of leadership than the…

Read Article
How to Elevate Executive Performance and Delegate the Rest

Most leaders are doing too much, and not enough. Too much of the wrong work, not enough of the right work. The answer is not more effort. It is leverage.…

Read Article
How You Define Success as a Leader Defines You

By Mazher Ahmad, with George Bradt Every leader eventually faces a moment that forces them to ask a deceptively simple question: What does success really mean to me? In the…

Read Article