Stop Hiring First-timers. Let Them Learn At Someone Else’s Expense

We all fail. Most of the time, the long-term benefits of the learning outweigh the near-term costs of the failure. This is especially true if you can get others to pay the costs while you get all the benefits. One way to do that is to avoid hiring “first-timers.”

Stop hiring first-time CEOs, first-time C-Suite executives, first-time dog-catchers. Stop hiring people into their first job out of an “academy” company, their first private equity portfolio company, or their first job in a new industry, geography or function. Every one of those people is going to have a steeper learning curve than people doing something they’ve done before.

In other words, apply the Nike approach to market expansion. As Nike expanded into adjacent opportunities they would change only one variable at a time across brands, sports, products, and geographies, holding the others steady. For example, their initial entry into a new geography was almost always Nike running shoes.

Anyone you hire from outside your company will be switching companies. That’s a big risky change on its own. Minimize their other risks by finding people that do not have to change functions, industries or geographies, and certainly not level, type of organization or ownership model.

Imagine you’re driving across the border from Ethiopia to Kenya. You see a sign that says “Welcome to Kenya.” What must you do? Think about it before you read on.

You must change sides of the road. In Ethiopia they drive on the right. In Kenya they drive on the left. If you don’t switch sides, you’ll have a head-on collision. While that is most definitely a bad thing, don’t worry if you didn’t know that. You’ve probably never driven across that border before.

On the other hand, if you’re a passenger in a car crossing that border you most definitely want to go in a car driven by someone who has done it and not a first-timer who doesn’t know the rules of the road.

Each organization, level, industry, ownership model, and geography has its own rules of the road. And some, like start-ups, don’t even have any roads.

40% of new leaders fail on their first 18 months, either getting fired, forced out or quitting. Most of the time it’s because of poor fit, poor delivery or poor ability to adjust to changes down the road. Those risks are materially greater for first-timers than for people that have some framework for how to fit in, how to deliver and how to recognize and deal with important changes.

The stories abound.

Consider the people in their first roles out of Procter & Gamble who were so used to everyone else actually doing what they said they were going to do and numbers actually being accurate that they got completely thrown off their game when things did not happen according to plan.

Consider all the people who went to their private equity sponsors with proposals for initiatives that more than paid back in five years only to be told there would be no investments with anything more than a two-year payback.

The leader of one early-stage company told me that some of his new executives seemed to think they could stand on the bridge and get the boat to accelerate simply by saying “all ahead.” They did not understand that they had to go down to the engine room and shovel the coal into the fire themselves.

First-time CEOs have it especially tough. Most likely, they will have gotten used to leading leaders in their previous roles and have proven themselves by managing down. But, if they are the senior most executive in the company reporting to the owners or board, they are going to have to spend at least 25% of their time managing up (board and shareholders) and at least 25% of their time managing external stakeholders like community leaders, collaborators and the press. That means they will be able to spend less than 50% of their time managing down – a dramatically different proposition.

I am, of course, exaggerating to make the point. Of course, you’re going to hire some first-timers. Just understand the risk. And avoid compounding the risks. Give them the extra onboarding support they are going to need to learn the rules of the road as they converge into the organization before trying to evolve it.

Click here for a categorized list of my Forbes articles

Read More Articles

The Artistry in Communication: Where Leadership Comes Alive

Executive communication is often taught as a process of alignment — aligning messages with culture, strategy, operations, and tactical missions. That’s necessary but not sufficient. The artistry lies not in…

Read Article
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through

Teams fail when direction is fuzzy, resources are ambiguous, or authority is blurred. Too often, leaders assign tasks without enough context for teams to make smart, independent decisions. The result?…

Read Article
Bring Yourself to Work

There are few career inflection points more challenging, or requiring more thoughtful planning, than assuming a position of leadership. We unconsciously acquire bits of our leadership persona over the course…

Read Article
Leadership Transition Lessons from the NFL

Leadership transitions are rarely about failure. They’re about timing. They’re about trajectory. And they’re about whether an organization believes its next chapter requires a different kind of leadership than the…

Read Article
High Stakes Landmines for Technology Executives

By Jeff Scott with George Bradt High-stakes onboarding landmines are everywhere for new technology executives, but few are as deadly—and as fixable—as a misaligned role. Being the right technology leader…

Read Article
How to Elevate Executive Performance and Delegate the Rest

Most leaders are doing too much, and not enough. Too much of the wrong work, not enough of the right work. The answer is not more effort. It is leverage.…

Read Article