What To Glean From Fluor’s Promoting Its General Counsel To CEO

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” _builder_version=”3.22″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.27.4″ module_alignment=”left” link_option_url=”https://www.forbes.com/sites/georgebradt/2019/05/21/managing-transplant-rejection-in-executive-onboarding/#4fd6f4f43c4d” link_option_url_new_window=”on”]

Fluor has confirmed Carlos Hernandez as its CEO. He was previously named interim CEO in early May after the David Seaton resigned following disappointing Q1 results. As Fluor’s stock price is currently just under $30, down from $43 just prior to this latest announcement and down from $79 in 2014, this is about more than just Q1 results.

While there’s no indication of improprieties, everything communicates. The choice of a new CEO speaks volumes about the board’s direction. More often than not, the choice of a General Counsel suggests a defensive posture. We’ll see if that’s the case here.

There’s an argument to be made that the days of business school-trained general managers are fading even faster than Fluor’s viability. That argument suggests the future belongs to specialists; and that those starting careers should pick one area in which to become expert.

Maybe. But I’m not sure.

You do know the difference between a generalist and specialist. Don’t you? A generalist is someone who knows less and less about more and more until eventually they know nothing about everything. A specialist is someone who knows more and more about less and less until eventually they know everything about nothing. They are both useless in the extreme.

There’s clearly value in building expertise in something. At the same time, at some point in every senior leader’s career, they need to learn how to manage people doing jobs they can’t do themselves. That is the essential difference between functional and general management.

Perhaps the future belongs not so much to the specialists themselves as to those that can lead diverse specialists.

Strategically Valuable Specialties

As discussed in my previous article on accelerating through a strategic point of inflection, each company should have one and only one over-arching strategy: design, produce, deliver or service. If the overall leader is going to have a specialty, it should probably be the one most aligned with the organization’s overall strategy: 

 

  • Design-focused organizations could be led by design specialists.
  • Production-focused organizations could be led by engineers.
  • Delivery-focused organizations could be led by master logisticians.
  • Service-focused organizations could be led by customer-service experts.

 

Alternately, sales and marketing experts can help boost top-line growth.

Or, you can turn to a functionally-trained leader with the right mind-set to lead the whole organization. Even then, whether they come out of finance, HR, IT, legal or anywhere else, they’ll need to enable design, enforce production, enroll others in distribution, or act as the chief customer experience officer in service as appropriate.

Hernandez at Fluor

This brings us back to Fluor. Got to assume Fluor’s board is scared. (If they’re not scared, they should be replaced.) They need someone they can trust to protect them against further downside.

Fluor is one of the world’s largest engineering, procurement, fabrication, construction and maintenance companies, offering integrated solutions for clients’ capital projects.​​​​​ Seems like the heart of the company is designing, building and maintaining big stuff. This naturally leads to an engineer at the helm.

That’s not the direction the board went. They went with the lawyer. Hernandez’ success is going to be dependent on his ability to apply his governance and compliance skills to production management.

Note I chose the word “management” deliberately. Managers direct and coordinate. Leaders inspire and enable. (More on that here.) Expect Hernandez to manage. Hopefully well.

Implications for you

If you’re the board, get ahead of the curve. Your most important job is to choose the CEO. Be clear on the long-term future capability plan. Know what type of company you’re trying to build. Identify and develop people that can be the right leaders of that organization. Move them across functions and business units so they can inspire and enable the most important specialists.

If you’re managing your own career. Do your own future capability plan. Think through what capabilities you want to develop over time. Pay particular attention to the balance of specialization and general management. If you choose to be a specialist, great. If you choose to be some sort of general manager, be deliberate about your steps to get there.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

Read More Articles

Primegenesis blog leadership executive onboarding
The Counterintuitive Advantage of Panicking Early

Panicking is bad. But panicking early is good because that means you won’t panic later. And therein lies the counterintuitive advantage of panicking early – those who panic early never…

Read Article
Why You Should Have More, Not Fewer Meetings | Meeting Effectiveness for Leaders

Meeting effectiveness is not about having fewer meetings. It is about having the right meetings, with the right people, for the right reasons, done in the right way. When leaders…

Read Article
The Artistry in Communication: Where Leadership Comes Alive

Executive communication is often taught as a process of alignment — aligning messages with culture, strategy, operations, and tactical missions. That’s necessary but not sufficient. The artistry lies not in…

Read Article
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through

Teams fail when direction is fuzzy, resources are ambiguous, or authority is blurred. Too often, leaders assign tasks without enough context for teams to make smart, independent decisions. The result?…

Read Article
High Stakes Landmines for Technology Executives

By Jeff Scott with George Bradt High-stakes onboarding landmines are everywhere for new technology executives, but few are as deadly—and as fixable—as a misaligned role. Being the right technology leader…

Read Article
Preparing For The Next Point Of Inflection With Contingency And Capability Plans

The next point of inflection is coming whether you’re ready for it or not. Your success as a leader doesn’t hinge on your ability to predict the future, but on…

Read Article