Learn From Serena Williams’ U.S. Open Performance And Control Your Reactions To Events

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” _builder_version=”3.22″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.27.4″ module_alignment=”left”]

Serena Williams’ reactions to the umpire’s calls in her U.S. Tennis Open final certainly cost her a point and a game and perhaps the match and title. Don’t do what she did. You can’t control some events. But you can, and must, control your reaction to events.

First Serena received a warning from the umpire for receiving help from her coach in the stands. Then, she slammed her racquet, broke it, and received a one-point penalty. Then she demanded an apology from the umpire and calling him a “thief.” He gave her a one-game penalty for “verbal abuse.” Then she lost the set and the match.

Many are asking whether the first warning was “fair.” Whether or not it was fair, it happened and Serena paid a material cost for her reaction.

Things are going to happen to you that you do not think are fair. You are certainly entitled to your own opinion about those events’ fairness and probably can’t control how you feel. Do understand there are consequences to how you choose to react. The strong suggestion is to stop and consider those consequences before deciding on your reaction. You might choose to:

 

  1. Not react at all.
  2. Register a polite objection and get on with what you were doing.
  3. Have a reasonable debate about the issue.
  4. Go to Defcon 1 and unleash the full power of your feelings.
  5. Walk away.

It is truly a choice.

  • Not reacting at all allows all to get back to what they were doing with minimum disruption. But there are no negative consequences for the person that did the unfair thing. Expect no change in the likelihood of it happening again.
  • A polite objection makes others aware of how you feel which may reduce the likelihood of it happening again.
  • A debate allows people to understand how you feel, but may be more of an immediate distraction than it is worth.
  • Defcon 1 will ensure people know how much you care about the injustice. It will make them consider future actions more carefully, but may cost you a point, game and match.
  • Walking away ends that interaction and perhaps your relationship.

There is no right answer. Perhaps Serena knew exactly what she was doing. Perhaps she was fighting for a higher purpose. Perhaps not. Be clear on what matters to you and why so you know if the slight is mortal, damaging or no big deal and react accordingly.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

Read More Articles

The Artistry in Communication: Where Leadership Comes Alive

Executive communication is often taught as a process of alignment — aligning messages with culture, strategy, operations, and tactical missions. That’s necessary but not sufficient. The artistry lies not in…

Read Article
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through

Teams fail when direction is fuzzy, resources are ambiguous, or authority is blurred. Too often, leaders assign tasks without enough context for teams to make smart, independent decisions. The result?…

Read Article
Bring Yourself to Work

There are few career inflection points more challenging, or requiring more thoughtful planning, than assuming a position of leadership. We unconsciously acquire bits of our leadership persona over the course…

Read Article
Leadership Transition Lessons from the NFL

Leadership transitions are rarely about failure. They’re about timing. They’re about trajectory. And they’re about whether an organization believes its next chapter requires a different kind of leadership than the…

Read Article
High Stakes Landmines for Technology Executives

By Jeff Scott with George Bradt High-stakes onboarding landmines are everywhere for new technology executives, but few are as deadly—and as fixable—as a misaligned role. Being the right technology leader…

Read Article
How to Elevate Executive Performance and Delegate the Rest

Most leaders are doing too much, and not enough. Too much of the wrong work, not enough of the right work. The answer is not more effort. It is leverage.…

Read Article