A Tool To Assess Onboarding Risk Before Accepting A New Job

If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it. With 40% of new leaders failing in their first 18 months in a new job, onboarding risk is definitely worth assessing and managing. Thus, this article proposes a simple onboarding risk calculator that will enable individuals to assess and manage the risk they face before they accept or start a new job based.

Let’s put the tool in context. Here’s what we know:

    1. 40% of new leaders either get fired, forced out or quit within their first 18 months.
    2. Failures in new roles almost always come back to either poor fit, not getting done what needed to get done, or failing to adjust to something changing down the road.
    3. People evaluating new situations need a better way to assess and manage risk.

Slide1

 

The Onboarding Risk Calculator

I suggest assessing your level of agreement with 12 statements:

  1. The organization I’m joining has a bias to risking more and gaining more versus protecting what it has now.
  2. Communication in the organization is generally more informal/face-to-face/verbal than formal/directed/written.
  3. The organization makes decisions with open debate and conflict encouraged versus more controlled and hierarchical.
  4. Personally, I generally prefer to risk more and gain more instead of protecting what I have now.
  5. I prefer to communicate informally/face-to-face/verbal versus formally/directed/written.
  6. I prefer decision-making that is diffused with open debate and conflict encouraged versus controlled and hierarchical.
  7. The organization’s strategy and ability to implement that strategy gives it a high likelihood of success.
  8. I, my new boss and key peers are aligned around my role and expectations.
  9. I personally have the right strengths, motivation and fit to succeed in this role.
  10. I have spent/will spend many hours with my direct supervisor before day one.
  11. My supervisor or another mentor will look out for me and guide me in the new organization.
  12. On average I worked in my last three organizations for at least three years each.

 

Assessment

The assessment of fit risk comes out of the alignment of individual preferences and organizational culture.

The assessment of delivery risk comes out of the organization’s strategy and ability to execute, alignment around role and expectations, and personal strengths, motivation and fit. (Yes. Cultural fit impacts the ability to deliver.)

The assessment of adjustment risk comes out of your relationship with your supervisor or other mentor and your track record of adjusting.

 

Implication

The calculator suggests you follow triage guidelines once you’ve assessed your risk.

  • If the risk level is relatively low, things should go well if you get a head start; manage your message; set direction and build your team; and then sustain momentum and deliver results over your first 100-days and beyond.
  • If there’s a manageable level of risk, follow the same prescriptions as if the risk level were low while keeping your eyes open for the particular risks of your situation.
  • If there are potentially mission-crippling issues with this role for you, you will need to address them before you start to reduce your likelihood of failure.
  • If the risk is extreme, consider walking away or at least having a back up plan.

 

Caveat

Note this tool provides a structure for your own assessment. But this may be counter-productive if you have bad information and/or fail to account for your own biases. The more complex the situation, the more help you’ll need in gathering and assessing information.

With that in mind, if you want to assess your risk and improve your likelihood of success, access the tool.

Read More Articles

Why You Should Have More, Not Fewer Meetings | Meeting Effectiveness for Leaders

Meeting effectiveness is not about having fewer meetings. It is about having the right meetings, with the right people, for the right reasons, done in the right way. When leaders…

Read Article
The Artistry in Communication: Where Leadership Comes Alive

Executive communication is often taught as a process of alignment — aligning messages with culture, strategy, operations, and tactical missions. That’s necessary but not sufficient. The artistry lies not in…

Read Article
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through

Teams fail when direction is fuzzy, resources are ambiguous, or authority is blurred. Too often, leaders assign tasks without enough context for teams to make smart, independent decisions. The result?…

Read Article
High Stakes Landmines for Technology Executives

By Jeff Scott with George Bradt High-stakes onboarding landmines are everywhere for new technology executives, but few are as deadly—and as fixable—as a misaligned role. Being the right technology leader…

Read Article
Preparing For The Next Point Of Inflection With Contingency And Capability Plans

The next point of inflection is coming whether you’re ready for it or not. Your success as a leader doesn’t hinge on your ability to predict the future, but on…

Read Article
The Baked Ziti Approach To Making The Implicit Explicit

Sometimes it’s best to hint at things implicitly so others can interpret as they see best. Sometimes it’s best to explain things explicitly so others can follow precise directions. And…

Read Article