Practical Strategy Lessons From Jimmy Carter, Jason Day And Donald Trump

Strategic planning is a theoretically elegant and practically useless exercise until you actually apply resources. There’s an art to knowing when to over-invest in must win situations, when to adjust as appropriate to keep things on track, and when to walk away. Lessons over the past couple of weeks from former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, professional golfer Jason Day and real estate developer Donald Trump underline the importance of knowing when to add “one more helicopter,” when to hit the safe shot or when to “take advantage of the laws of this country” to avoid compounding errors.

 

Jimmy Carter And Iran Hostages

When asked what he would have done differently during his time in the White House, Carter, during an August 20,2015 press conference, referred to the botched raid to rescue American hostages in Iran:

I wish I’d sent one more helicopter to get the hostages and we would have rescued them and I would have been reelected.

Bad things happened during that operation. Helicopters had hydraulic problems, cracked rotor blades, ran into sand storms and crashed into transport planes. Participants still debate whether they had enough resources to keep going or not. The call on the ground and approved by President Carter was that the resources were insufficient. So the mission was aborted.

 

Jason Day And PGA Championship Sand Traps

In the lead at the PGA championship, Day hit into a nasty fairway sand bunker. While he might conceivable have hit out of the sand and onto the green to save par, instead he chose to hit a relatively safe shot onto the fairway and go for one over par. He went on to win the tournament by three strokes.

 

Donald Trump And Atlantic City Casinos

When things went bad in Atlantic City, Trump’s gaming companies there declared bankruptcy. He took the hit, walked away from all of his equity in these organizations and lived to fight another day in another place. What he did not do was to keep pumping money into his properties there hoping they would turn around. He might have been able to turn them around, but the better bet was to “take advantage of the laws of this country” and not compound the pain.

 

Your Approach

Strategy is about the creation and allocation of resources to the right place, in the right way, at the right time over time that bring to fruition your mission, vision, objectives, and goals while maintaining your values. The corollary is to avoid putting resources in the wrong place, in the wrong way at the wrong time.

 

Carter, Day And Trump’s Lessons Apply To Three Situations:

1. The choice of place, way and time around the hostage mission can certainly be debated. What was clear was that once that choice was made to green light the mission, it was an all-or-nothing situation. If the mission failed, Iran would most likely scatter the hostages to different locations and increase its defensive preparedness level (as it did).

In situations like this, over-invest in resources to ensure success. This is particularly applicable when it comes to Early Wins. Since their success has a multiplier benefit, they deserve a far greater allocation of resources than normal.

Apache Helicopters (Photo by Matt Cardy/Getty Images)

2. Jason Day did not need to get on the green with that particular sand shot. He just needed to minimize the risk of disaster.

In situations like this, choose the safer approach. Stop. Regroup. Rethink. Take your medicine. Get back on track. And keep going.

3. Donald Trump’s overall enterprise, family and personal well-being was not dependent upon success in Atlantic City.

In situations like this, cut your losses and walk away. The bankruptcy laws enable risk-taking by limiting losses. Apply the same thinking to your organization’s innovations. By encouraging people to declare an initiative a failure and move on, you increase the likelihood of their trying to innovate again.

Read More Articles

Why You Should Have More, Not Fewer Meetings | Meeting Effectiveness for Leaders

Meeting effectiveness is not about having fewer meetings. It is about having the right meetings, with the right people, for the right reasons, done in the right way. When leaders…

Read Article
The Artistry in Communication: Where Leadership Comes Alive

Executive communication is often taught as a process of alignment — aligning messages with culture, strategy, operations, and tactical missions. That’s necessary but not sufficient. The artistry lies not in…

Read Article
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through

Teams fail when direction is fuzzy, resources are ambiguous, or authority is blurred. Too often, leaders assign tasks without enough context for teams to make smart, independent decisions. The result?…

Read Article
High Stakes Landmines for Technology Executives

By Jeff Scott with George Bradt High-stakes onboarding landmines are everywhere for new technology executives, but few are as deadly—and as fixable—as a misaligned role. Being the right technology leader…

Read Article
Preparing For The Next Point Of Inflection With Contingency And Capability Plans

The next point of inflection is coming whether you’re ready for it or not. Your success as a leader doesn’t hinge on your ability to predict the future, but on…

Read Article
The Baked Ziti Approach To Making The Implicit Explicit

Sometimes it’s best to hint at things implicitly so others can interpret as they see best. Sometimes it’s best to explain things explicitly so others can follow precise directions. And…

Read Article