Assume Good Faith in Onboarding

WASHINGTON - NOVEMBER 15:  Newly elected membe...
 

"Assume Good Faith" is one of the fundamental principles of Wikipedia.  In general, it works for them because most people are indeed trying to help the project, not hurt it.  Can we apply that principle to onboarding?  I vote yes.

In general, most try to help a new team member, not hurt him or her.  The organization likely invested time and effort to find, select and convince that new team member to join in.  The organization as a whole believes that new team member can strengthen the collective.  Thus, it is in the organization's best interest for that new team member to succees.

Don't Follow Your Principles Off A Cliff

But, and it's a big but, "in general" is not the same as always.  There are going to be people that act in bad faith.  There are going to be people that feel threatened by a new employee and try to hurt him or her.  So, just as Wikipedia counsels not to follow the assume good faith principle too aggressively, the same is true in onboarding.  Assume good faith as long as you can, but always be ready to deal with people acting in bad faith.

 

Read More Articles

Primegenesis blog leadership executive onboarding
The Counterintuitive Advantage of Panicking Early

Panicking is bad. But panicking early is good because that means you won’t panic later. And therein lies the counterintuitive advantage of panicking early – those who panic early never…

Read Article
Why You Should Have More, Not Fewer Meetings | Meeting Effectiveness for Leaders

Meeting effectiveness is not about having fewer meetings. It is about having the right meetings, with the right people, for the right reasons, done in the right way. When leaders…

Read Article
The Artistry in Communication: Where Leadership Comes Alive

Executive communication is often taught as a process of alignment — aligning messages with culture, strategy, operations, and tactical missions. That’s necessary but not sufficient. The artistry lies not in…

Read Article
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through

Teams fail when direction is fuzzy, resources are ambiguous, or authority is blurred. Too often, leaders assign tasks without enough context for teams to make smart, independent decisions. The result?…

Read Article
High Stakes Landmines for Technology Executives

By Jeff Scott with George Bradt High-stakes onboarding landmines are everywhere for new technology executives, but few are as deadly—and as fixable—as a misaligned role. Being the right technology leader…

Read Article
Preparing For The Next Point Of Inflection With Contingency And Capability Plans

The next point of inflection is coming whether you’re ready for it or not. Your success as a leader doesn’t hinge on your ability to predict the future, but on…

Read Article