Impact the Important

There was a marked difference between Budget Meetings and Category Reviews at Procter & Gamble when I was there.

Budget Meetings

Budget Meetings were brand teams' main planning meeting with their head of marketing.  Months of preparation when into these two hour meetings.  Brand Managers and their internal and external teams were expected to have one page talking points ready to answer almost any conceivable question about their business – most of which got asked.

Category Reviews

Category Reviews with the CEO were much more focused.  The Category Manager and his or her team submitted their annual plan a week in advance.  This submission was limited to a five page memo and up to 12 pages of attachments.  At the review meeting, the CEO would ask 2-3 questions which were debated in depth.

Both of these impacted the important because what was important was different in the different meetings.  Budget Meetings were training exercises on thorough analysis and preparation.  Thoroughness was the key.  Category Reviews were about fundamental strategic choices.  Hence, these focused on the 2-3 issues with the most impact.

Implications

Be clear on what change you're trying to make.  Remember the old admonition not to confuse activity with progress.  As you're managing change, make sure people are focusing their efforts on things that impact the important.

Read More Articles

Why You Should Have More, Not Fewer Meetings | Meeting Effectiveness for Leaders

Meeting effectiveness is not about having fewer meetings. It is about having the right meetings, with the right people, for the right reasons, done in the right way. When leaders…

Read Article
The Artistry in Communication: Where Leadership Comes Alive

Executive communication is often taught as a process of alignment — aligning messages with culture, strategy, operations, and tactical missions. That’s necessary but not sufficient. The artistry lies not in…

Read Article
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through

Teams fail when direction is fuzzy, resources are ambiguous, or authority is blurred. Too often, leaders assign tasks without enough context for teams to make smart, independent decisions. The result?…

Read Article
High Stakes Landmines for Technology Executives

By Jeff Scott with George Bradt High-stakes onboarding landmines are everywhere for new technology executives, but few are as deadly—and as fixable—as a misaligned role. Being the right technology leader…

Read Article
Preparing For The Next Point Of Inflection With Contingency And Capability Plans

The next point of inflection is coming whether you’re ready for it or not. Your success as a leader doesn’t hinge on your ability to predict the future, but on…

Read Article
The Baked Ziti Approach To Making The Implicit Explicit

Sometimes it’s best to hint at things implicitly so others can interpret as they see best. Sometimes it’s best to explain things explicitly so others can follow precise directions. And…

Read Article