Clarity around Direction, Leadership, Roles

One of the most important learnings in the after action review re: last month's tornado in Bridgeport, Connecticut was the importance of clarity around direction, leadership and roles.  Or, in other words, the importance of sticking with the basics.  Our partner Harry Kangis continually reminds us about the importance of clarifying these three things in physical crises, business crises and day-to-day management, and probably in this order.

Direction

The people working on the crisis in Bridgeport accomplished almost everything they set out to accomplish largely because they were all aligned around what was important – providing relief to the victims of the disaster.  When we work with leaders in new jobs or new roles, one of the very first things we do is get them and their teams aligned around a shared purpose and imperative.

Leadership

There was a lot of confusion during the Bridgeport response.  At first people thought it was a breakdown in leadership.  Upon closer examination, we determined that was not the case.  The Incident Command System worked.  There was always a "pilot-in-charge".  And there was always someone making key decisions around the different pieces of the effort.  This is important stuff in a crisis and in all business situations.

Roles

One of the main opportunities for improvement in the Bridgeport response was more clarity around roles.  The response team got flooded with volunteers.  There was a fair amount of confusion around who could be doing what, when.  This is why milestone management systems and role sorts are so important in both crises and other business situations.

At the risk of sounding like Maslow's hammer running around the world looking for nails to hit, we do keep learning that you can make an impact in most crisis or normal business situations by aligning people, plans and practices around a shared purpose.

Read More Articles

Why You Should Have More, Not Fewer Meetings | Meeting Effectiveness for Leaders

Meeting effectiveness is not about having fewer meetings. It is about having the right meetings, with the right people, for the right reasons, done in the right way. When leaders…

Read Article
The Artistry in Communication: Where Leadership Comes Alive

Executive communication is often taught as a process of alignment — aligning messages with culture, strategy, operations, and tactical missions. That’s necessary but not sufficient. The artistry lies not in…

Read Article
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through
How Mission Briefs Accelerate Progress by Clarifying Direction, Resources, Authority, and Follow-Through

Teams fail when direction is fuzzy, resources are ambiguous, or authority is blurred. Too often, leaders assign tasks without enough context for teams to make smart, independent decisions. The result?…

Read Article
High Stakes Landmines for Technology Executives

By Jeff Scott with George Bradt High-stakes onboarding landmines are everywhere for new technology executives, but few are as deadly—and as fixable—as a misaligned role. Being the right technology leader…

Read Article
Preparing For The Next Point Of Inflection With Contingency And Capability Plans

The next point of inflection is coming whether you’re ready for it or not. Your success as a leader doesn’t hinge on your ability to predict the future, but on…

Read Article
The Baked Ziti Approach To Making The Implicit Explicit

Sometimes it’s best to hint at things implicitly so others can interpret as they see best. Sometimes it’s best to explain things explicitly so others can follow precise directions. And…

Read Article