Onboarding Context and Culture

One of the most critical inputs into an onboarding plan is an assessment of context and culture. The context has three parts: the business environment, the organization's history, its recent business results. The environment is comprised of customers, collaborators, capabilities, competitors, and conditions (the five Cs). Strongly suggest you look at the business context and evaluate how significantly and urgently the organization needs to change given that context.

Then, evaluate the organizational culture's openness to that change.  Yesterday's post on a B.R.A.V.E. Framework for Thinking about Culture gives you a start on that.  In the end, all the components together should give you a read on the most important aspect of an organization's culture – its readiness to change.

It's useful to think in terms of SURFACES: Smooth Sailing, Unsustainable Calm, Ready to Accelerate, Facing Disaster, each yielding a different indicated action:

  • Smooth Sailing – If the context does not require significant changes now and the culture is ready to change, Assimilate in.  The organization will figure out the changes it needs to make over time.
  • Unstable Calm – If the context does not require significant changes now, but the culture is not ready to change, Converge & Evolve slowly, applying a steady stream of little shocks.  Eventually changes will be required.  But you have time to become part of the organization before pushing the changes.
  • Ready to Accelerate – If the context does require significant changes now and the culture is ready to change, Converge & Evolve quickly.  You may be the catalyst that helps the organization wake up to the need for change.
  • Facing Disaster – If the context does require significant changes now and the culture is not ready to change, then you must Shock the system for it to survive.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] about matching the individual to the context and culture as described in my previous post.  The right person has to be right not just for the business context, but also for where the [...]

  2. [...] (Follow this link for more on appreciating context and culture) [...]

  3. [...] The learning from Due Diligence flows into how the new leader prepares to engage with that culture during his or her Fuzzy Front End.  It's important to look at culture and context at the same time as we describe in our article on culture and context. [...]

  4. [...] Context is a function of the business environment, organizational history, and recent business performance, informing the relative importance and urgency of change.  Culture underpins “the way we do things here” and is made up of Behaviors, Relationships, Attitudes, Values, and the Environment feeding into readiness for change. Crossing context and culture helps you decide whether to Assimilate, Converge and Evolve (fast or slow), or Shock.  Choose your way during the early stages of evaluating a possible acquisition.  Then map contributors, detractors, and convincible watchers so you can move each of them one step by altering their balance of consequences. [...]

  5. [...] (Follow this link for more on appreciating context and culture) [...]

  6. [...] In Thompson’s case, a critical piece of making the move from PayPal to Yahoo! is figuring out the context and culture, impending acquisition and divestiture moves and how he should engage the Yahoo! [...]

  7. [...] Converging and evolving is almost always the right approach for a new leader.  Yes, sometimes you can stretch out the converging phase so long that the approach looks a lot like assimilating.  And sometimes you need to evolve so fast that it’s a shock to the system.  But both assimilation and shock are really just extreme cases of converge and evolve depending upon the context and culture. [...]

  8. [...] Converging and evolving is almost always the right approach for a new leader.  Yes, sometimes you can stretch out the converging phase so long that the approach looks a lot like assimilating.  And sometimes you need to evolve so fast that it’s a shock to the system.  But both assimilation and shock are really just extreme cases of converge and evolve depending upon the context and culture. [...]

  9. [...] Converging and evolving is almost always the right approach for a new leader.  Yes, sometimes you can stretch out the converging phase so long that the approach looks a lot like assimilating.  And sometimes you need to evolve so fast that it’s a shock to the system.  But both assimilation and shock are really just extreme cases of converge and evolve depending upon the context and culture. [...]

  10. [...] Converging and evolving is almost always the right approach for a new leader.  Yes, sometimes you can stretch out the converging phase so long that the approach looks a lot like assimilating.  And sometimes you need to evolve so fast that it’s a shock to the system.  But both assimilation and shock are really just extreme cases of converge and evolve depending upon the context and culture. [...]

Speak Your Mind

*